Can a compact, professional-standard, mid-range zoom lens costing £1,200 really deliver? Mat Gallagher discovers that there’s more to life than an f/2.8 optic

Product Overview

Overall rating:

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM

Star rating:

Product:

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM review

Manufacturer:

Price as reviewed:

£1,600.00
TAGS:
We continually check thousands of prices to show you the best deals. If you buy a product through our site we will earn a small commission from the retailer – a sort of automated referral fee – but our reviewers are always kept separate from this process. You can read more about how we make money in our Ethics Policy.

Our verdict

Canon’s EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM lens doesn’t have the impressive numbers you would expect from a professional optic, especially in the aperture range, and its compact size has meant some of the sleek features such as internal zoom haven’t been possible.

However, this lens is small in stature and in price, and while you could buy a 70-200mm f/4 for less, by the time you added the 1.4x extender the price would be practically the same and the unit would be considerably larger.

Where this lens excels, though, is in the quality, holding its own against a lens considered to be one of the best in its day. For this reason, not only does this lens deserve its professional status but it is also a great buy.

We continually check thousands of prices to show you the best deals. If you buy a product through our site we will earn a small commission from the retailer – a sort of automated referral fee – but our reviewers are always kept separate from this process. You can read more about how we make money in our Ethics Policy.

Details

Filter size:67mm
Construction:19 elements in 14 groups
Focus Markings:Yes (window)
Diaphragm Blades:8
Stabilisation:Yes (4 stops)
Focal Length:70-300mm
Max diameter x length:89x143mm
Weight:1,050g
RRP:£1,600
Min Aperture:f/32-45
  1. 1. Introduction
  2. 2. Features
  3. 3. Build and handling
  4. 4. Focusing and aperture
  5. 5. Image sharpness, quality and resolution
  6. 6. Our verdict
Page 6 of 6 - Show Full List