1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Lens choices

Discussion in 'Canon Conflab' started by EightBitTony, Jul 30, 2018.

  1. EightBitTony

    EightBitTony Well-Known Member

    So after selling a few lenses and an old body, I have some money to invest in something new (secondhand).

    I have no need of a new lens, but I want one.

    I currently have 17-50 (EF-S, Sigma), 10-18 (EF-S, Canon), 24-105 (EF, Canon, L), 70-200 f/4 IS (EF, Canon, L).

    I use the 24-105 on my 7D2 body for 90% of what I shoot, with the 70-200 getting the rest of the use, and then the 17-50 (which is gorgeous) and the 10-18 getting sporadic use these days.

    I also have a 6D body, which I obviously can't use the two EF-S lenses on.

    I just got rid of an 18-270 (quality just not good enough any more), and a 100-400, too big, too heavy, too specialist.

    I'm torn between,

    Canon EF 17-40 f/4 L
    Canon EF 16-35 f/4 IS L
    Canon EF 70-300 IS L

    Two sort of similar, and one very different lens.

    The wide angles would be to cover that option on the 6D, and the 70-300 because I wonder if the 70-200 isn't always going to be long enough.

    Any comments? Any other suggestions of a favourite lens? Would need to be no more than around £800 second hand (or new).

    NB: The longer the money hangs around the more likely I am to spend it on bills or a Fuji ;)
     
  2. Benchista

    Benchista Which Tyler

    If you can stump up for a 16-35 f4, forget about the 17-40, it's better in every possible way (except, I suppose, reach at the longer end). The 17-40 is soft wide open, although it's fine from about f8, so if you're only using it for landscapes on a tripod, it's fine. Some people think it's ok on a crop camera, as you're cropping out the softer edges, but I actually always found it rather disappointing on that.
    The 16-35 and 70-300 are two of my favourite lenses, and it's a very rare day when they're not both in my bag.
     
    Gezza, EightBitTony and Scphoto like this.
  3. RogerMac

    RogerMac Well-Known Member

    Just a 2p worth:
    Of course it all depends, the 16-35L is a very good lens and makes an excellent all purpose walk about. Images have a certain sparkle that I do not get with any of my other lenses. I also have a 70-300 (not the L} which is very nice and sharp and also has its uses. My avatar was taken by a granddaughter with the 70-300 at full stretch in ridiculously low light (its uncropped)
     
    EightBitTony likes this.
  4. PeteRob

    PeteRob Well-Known Member

    I traded my 17-40 L for the 16-35 F4 L with no regrets. The latest 70-300L is supposed to be very good. It is not a lens that I have used. I went 70-200, then 300 F4 reasoning that if I needed more than 200 mm it would probably be for the 300 mm end and a prime would be better, but there was not the quality zoom option at the time. Now I have the 100-400 Lii which is very good (but heavy) on full frame and covers most of what I'd use a 70-300 mm zoom for.
     
    EightBitTony likes this.
  5. Bazarchie

    Bazarchie Well-Known Member

    Would you use the new lens mainly on the 6D and for street photography?
     
  6. EightBitTony

    EightBitTony Well-Known Member

    Probably not street photography as such, the 6D isn't quick enough, and doesn't have enough focus points, for the way I shoot street. I am thinking of doing a bit of seascape / landscape stuff, and I could justify the 16-35 L on the 6D for that. Otherwise it would be indoor family events or any other indoor kind of stuff. Few and far between to be honest. But as I said, it's not something I need, just something I happen to have the funds for at the moment and if I don't use it, I'll lose it.
     
  7. daft_biker

    daft_biker Action Man!

    2nd hand arca Swiss cube?

    I know it's not a lens but how many zooms does one need. (except Nick;))
     
    EightBitTony likes this.
  8. Bazarchie

    Bazarchie Well-Known Member

    I have the 17-40L which is fine for me but comes in for a lot of negative feedback. I have tried the 16-35 L IS and preferred the results, but it is more expensive. You could perhaps buy a 17-40L and a non L 70-300.
     
  9. EightBitTony

    EightBitTony Well-Known Member

    I'm already tempted by another camera body I don't need (Fuji XT-something), I don't need any more temptation!
     
    daft_biker likes this.
  10. EightBitTony

    EightBitTony Well-Known Member

    None of the 16-35 f4 for sale second hand in Wex or the two LCE's near to me. I guess people don't sell them on since they're so good?
     
    RogerMac likes this.
  11. Benchista

    Benchista Which Tyler

    You would have to prise mine from my cold, dead hands.
     
    EightBitTony likes this.
  12. EightBitTony

    EightBitTony Well-Known Member

    Just had a thought, what about a second EF 24-105 f4 L but get the mark II?

    Anyone have the mark ii? Significant improvement over the mark i?
     
  13. PeteRob

    PeteRob Well-Known Member

    I'd expect the IS to be better but memory says that optically the AP review said they are similar. Why not just get a new 16-35 F4 ?

    Another wide angle option that's a bit of fun is the 24 TSE mk ii - but the price has hiked.
     
  14. EightBitTony

    EightBitTony Well-Known Member

    New 16-35 f4 is definitely an option, although it's above my budget by a little more than £100. I have seen some second hand prices, and it obviously holds price very well, so I'll need to decide if saving £150 is worth getting a used one for.
     
  15. Benchista

    Benchista Which Tyler

    Another of my all-time favourites. ;)
     
  16. Benchista

    Benchista Which Tyler

    Made me consider what my favourite lenses are that get regular use*:

    Canon EF

    8-15mm L fisheye zoom - I like fisheyes. I love the fact that this is 2 in 1 on full frame, and a diagonal fisheye on APS-C.
    16-35mm f4 L IS
    24-70mm f4 L IS - not as good a range as the 24-105, but sharper, less distortion, and a very useful near-macro setting (0.7x)
    70-200mm f4L IS (But I sold this one)
    70-300mm L IS - I found I was using the 1.4x too often on the 70-200, and this lens being shorter fits my bag better
    100-400mm L IS II - I find this too heavy for regular use when I'm carrying several other lenses, which is a shame.

    100mm f2.8 L Macro - Excellent macro lens, very nice (but sometimes too sharp) portrait lens
    TS-E 24mm L II - Wonderful lens. Slow, but very sharp when used normally, and great movements

    Canon EF-M

    22mm f2 - I love this little lens. It's the digital equivalent of my old Leica 40mm f2 Summicron-C, tiny but lovely.
    11-22mm - I call it the Midget Gem - not quite as good as the 16-35 on full frame, but remarkably good for such a small lens.


    The quality of these zooms is something I wouldn't have thought possible not all that many years ago. I've sold quite a few primes which frankly either didn't perform as well, or at best, were about as good. The primes I have left either have some feature the zooms don't, or are essentially worthless (my absolutely ancient 300mm f4 L USM with scratched front element and intermittent focusing fault - which is how I bought it, cheap, nearly 20 years ago).


    * I have lots of favourite classic lenses, almost all primes. Well, no, ALL primes if we're talking favourites.
     
    EightBitTony likes this.
  17. EightBitTony

    EightBitTony Well-Known Member

    Useful @Benchista , thank you :)

    I love my 70-200 f4 (I'll love it more when I get it properly dialled in again), and I don't find myself short of distance using it on the 7d2, but I am still half tempted by the 70-300. I'll probably still go for the 16-35 though.

    I did think about the 11-22mm on the EF-M (I've got the 22mm f2 permanently attached atm), but I was really trying hard to just stick the 22mm because it first in my pocket (kind of).
     
  18. EightBitTony

    EightBitTony Well-Known Member

    I clicked buy.

    (On the EF 16-35 f4, new, from Wex, using the £120 I got for the 600D I part-exed to them).

    Now I have to go lie down.
     
    Benchista, RogerMac and daft_biker like this.
  19. daft_biker

    daft_biker Action Man!

    Think my 24mm f/2.8 falls into that category......could easily be replaced by a more modern zoom which would likely take less time in the lens correction bit of DPP. It's small and light and has a tendency to live in my camera bag where all my other lenses get picked according to what I intend to shoot.
     
    Benchista likes this.
  20. Chester AP

    Chester AP Well-Known Member

    'I have no need of a new lens, but I want one.'

    Alternatively, use the money to help finance a visit to Venice in in late October/early November, or Tuscany in early May, and enjoy using the decent kit you already have.
     
    Andrew Flannigan likes this.

Share This Page