I've been tempted to try out a medium format camera for a while, but I want one with a few bells and whistles - I'm not trying to reinvent the wheel! These two seem to be reasonable choices, but I'm having trouble telling them apart. The secondhand value of the Fuji is about £750-£800, and the Pentax, £1250-£1350. An argument often made against the Fuji is the limits of the fixed zoom lens, covering 34-56mm (35mm terms). However, I'm not sure I'd add any more lenses to the Pentax's 50mm (35mm equivalent), in view of the horrible cost. While some might want to question the quality, a certain other magazine was hardly damning recently of it, and www.photographyreview.com has a few reviews which suggest eg the lens is extremely high quality, and they overall rank it highly. It seems to me the only advantage of the Pentax is the colour - yes, I'm one of the 'it must be black' obsessed people! I travel a bit, once in a while in Eastern Europe/Russia, and don't want a camera that shouts 'MUG ME!' too loudly - the Pentax is a little more restrained there. Opinions?