The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 may be the first Micro Four Thirds camera to sport a 20.3-million-pixel sensor, but it has a whole host of other updates too. Andy Westlake takes it for a spin

Product Overview

Overall rating:

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Features:
Build/Handling:
Metering:
Autofocus:
AWB Colour:
Dynamic Range:
LCD viewfinder:

Pros:

  • + Impressive feature set
  • + Effective in-body image stabilisation
  • + Excellent viewfinder and screen
  • + Great image quality in raw

Cons:

  • - Relatively bulky
  • - Connectors block articulated screen
  • - Uninspiring JPEG colour output
  • - Pedestrian styling

Product:

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review

Manufacturer:

Price as reviewed:

£1,000.00 (body only)

Latest deal

Loading

Panasonic Lumix DMC GX8 review: Viewfinder and screen

GX8 EVF + screen

The viewfinder tilts, and the screen is fully articulated

When it comes to composing your images, the GX8 offers probably the best experience of any CSC on the market. The 2.36-million-dot electronic viewfinder has 100% coverage and 0.77x magnification, giving a view as large as professional full-frame DSLRs and matching premium CSCs like the Fujifilm X-T1 and Olympus OM-D E-M5 II. Being of the OLED type, it’s not prone to the rainbow-coloured rearing that beset the GX7’s field-sequential LCD, and it can tilt 90° upwards, which can be useful for shooting at awkward angles. The viewfinder optics are superb, giving a clear view into the corners of the frame, and the colour rendition is accurate. The eyecup can be removed and replaced by an optional deeper version for shooting in bright light.

The rear screen is also excellent. It’s a 3in, 1.04-million-dot OLED screen that’s now fully articulated, rather than tilt-only like the GX7’s, making it great for shooting at odd angles with the camera in both portrait and landscape formats, encouraging creative shooting. While OLED screens previously had a reputation for inaccurate, oversaturated colour, the GX8’s screen again provides pretty true-to-life rendition. Oh, and it can also be used for selfies, if that’s your thing.

GX8 + microphone

Plugging in a microphone restricts the screen’s movements (and will usually require a 2.8mm adapter)

There is a catch, though. If you plug anything into the camera’s connectors – remote release, microphone or HDMI cable – the screen’s movements become severely restricted, both by the connected accessory and the cover for the ports. Much the same thing happens on the Olympus OM-D E-M5 II, but if anything the GX8 is worse afflicted because of how the cover hinges forwards rather than downwards out of the way of the screen.

  1. 1. Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review - Introduction
  2. 2. Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review: Features
  3. 3. Panasonic Lumix DMC GX8 review: Viewfinder and screen
  4. 4. Panasonic Lumix DMX-GX8 review: Build and handling
  5. 5. Panasonic Lumix DMC-G8 review: In-body/dual IS
  6. 6. Panasonic Lumix DMX-GX8 review: Performance
  7. 7. Panasonic Lumix DMC GX8 review: Image quality
  8. 8. Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review: Verdict
  9. 9. Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review: Specifications
Page 3 of 9 - Show Full List
  • RadiantFlowers

    Title needs updating, this is GX8, not G8
    “Panasonic Lumix DMC-G8 review: In-body/dual IS”

  • sam

    Some people for some reason get their kicks out of criticising everything they can’t afford. Such a bitter person hoping a company which is innovating more than most to bring us new features (and profit for themselves of course, they are ‘in business’) loses money on a product is just plain negative. If it’s not something he likes he should just turn the page and move on.

  • entoman

    Cameras just keep getting better and better don’t they!

    Every month one manufacturer or another adds a new innovation or a leap in quality, creating a really competitive market. We’re really spoilt for choice nowadays.

    It’s fantastic to have so many absolutely superb cameras to choose from, with a huge choice of models from Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Pentax, Fuijifilm and Panasonic.

    There quite literally is something that is perfect for everyone.

  • entoman

    I’m a DSLR man, but if I was in the market for a rangefinder-style, interchangeable lens, mirrorless camera, this is most definitely the one I would buy. The specification is excellent, the size is sensible, quality of construction faultless.

    Of course, the major advantage of the 4/3rd system (masses of high quality, lightweight, compact lenses to choose from), is outweighed to a large degree by the limitations of the small sensor (lowish pixel count, noise at high ISO). But, unless you are shooting for publication, it’s probably adequate – and future 4/3rd cameras will undoubtedly overcome many of the current sensor’s limitations. For amateurs it’s a good system to buy into, and can only get better.

  • poopchute

    You clearly haven’t been paying attention, if you think it is unremarkable. And I’m curious, how exactly are they trying to rip off the public?
    I too thought it was a little ugly at first, but it has grown on me. But that doesn’t really matter anyway, does it? It’s just personal opinion. For example, I think Soccer was created so the mentally challenged have something to entertain themselves with. But, that’s just my opinion.

  • Turbofrog

    Nothing remarkable about it except for one of the biggest viewfinders of any camera on the market (FF and MF DSLRs included), one of the most sophisticated image stabilization systems, one of the most sophisticated 4K video implementations, some of the best direct controls and touch-screen UX, full weather sealing, and image quality that competes strongly with other new camera models that cost the same? Nothing remarkable except for all those things?

  • Chris Hawley

    VERY ugly camera, and nothing remarkable about it. Impossible to justify charging £1000 for something this mundane. Hope they lose money on this, trying to rip off the public.