Sony’s latest high-end travel compact features technology designed to make it easier for you to produce great shots. We find out if the HX9V really does the job

Product Overview

Overall rating:

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V


Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V review


Price as reviewed:


Latest deal


Features and build

At the heart of the HX9V is a 1/2.3in Exmor R CMOS sensor, now with 16.2 million effective pixels. Exmor R sensors were first introduced to Sony cameras in 2009 and use a back-illuminated design to allow increased sensitivity and reduced noise; this version, also shared by the Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V and HX7V, is the highest resolution of its type and size.

The sensor is paired up with a Bionz processor to offer an ISO range of 100-3200 and enough speed to provide the 10fps burst shooting and intelligent panorama controls. One disappointment is that images can only be saved in JPEG format, with no raw alternative.

The lens has a 16x zoom, which extends from a 24mm wide equivalent through to 384mm, with a maximum aperture of f/3.3-5.9 and a minimum aperture of f/8-14. SteadyShot optical stabilisation is built in, and macro focusing is available up to 5cm at its wide setting or 120cm at full zoom.

The shooting modes include a program setting and a fully manual mode but, strangely, no aperture or shutter priority. However, as only two apertures are ever available (minimum and maximum), the manual mode is easy to use.

On top of the scene modes and iAuto mode, the Superior Auto (iAuto+) mode recognises the type of shot, then takes a quick burst of images at differing exposures and combines the results to achieve higher quality and lower image noise. The dedicated background defocus mode maintains the maximum aperture and recommends your subject distance to optimise the effect.

Image: Superior Auto mode analyses the scene, then takes a burst of images at different exposures and combines the results for improved quality

There is also a range of 3D modes for panoramic, multi-shot and still images, which can be displayed on 3D-compatible TVs or computers but not on the camera itself. The 3D Still Image mode uses two exposures and combines them to simulate a 3D effect, so lacks the true movement of the panoramic feature.

In program or manual mode, the HX9V allows control over ISO, white balance (including manual adjustment), AF point selection, three metering options (spot, centreweighted and evaluative), and bracketing controls. Other focusing options include manual focus, face detection, and Smile Shutter, which fires the shutter automatically when the subject smiles.

The camera’s video shooting capabilities have also been upgraded from those in the HX5V, and offers full HD (1920×1080 pixels, 50i) with increased bit rate averaging 24Mb/s, compared to 17Mb/s on the HX5V at its highest setting. The HX9V also includes GPS data capture, which is embedded into the JPEG files and video for geotagging.

The body of the camera is small, stylish and rather simple in design. There are no extreme protrusions and, with the lens retracted, it fits easily into a trouser pocket. It is almost identical in looks to the HX5V, except for the new rubberised grip on the front and thumb position on the rear, and the location of the flash. While the flash was previously built into the front of the camera, it now pops out of the top-plate, sitting higher above the lens. On the rear, the 3in, 921,600-dot LCD takes up most of the space, with just four buttons, including a direct movie record button next to a four-way selection dial, which also offers rotation.

Although the HX9V uses the same battery as the HX5V, the power consumption has been optimised to improve its lifetime from 310 to 410 shots.

  1. 1. Introduction
  2. 2. Features and build
  3. 3. Performance
  4. 4. Verdict
Page 2 of 4 - Show Full List
  • m c craig

    nice body useful zoom would have liked 24mm eq.
    pity they let computer programmers loose on it instead of photographers just too clever but appreciate the eye level view finder great street pic camera.
    results are reasonable my om 4 is faster to use
    why no tripod screw on case
    overpriced flashes etc

  • bazz

    EXR is amazing……at 6mp.who needs more.
    Raw is a waste of a lifetime. Jpegs can be tweeked.Put the X10 into Exr Auto and let it do the job for you.
    Viewfinder is brilliant.
    Use the viewfinder….shoot jpegs ..reduce the m ega pixels to medium and let the camera think faster than you can…then get on with some real photography.

  • John Duder

    This is a first impressions review, on the basis of a few days’ ownership.

    I wanted a camera that I can keep in a jacket pocket or my briefcase, but which will give me enough “real camera” features to be satisfying to use.

    That means RAW files, a proper viewfinder, a decent level of control of the camera, and a lens that is designed for real use, rather than impossibly ambitious telephoto use.

    The X-10 fits the bill nicely, with a wide-aperture lens and a lovely feel to it.

    Results are decent – maybe time and experience will make them excellent, or perhaps using an Alpha 900 and continuing to use film spoil me!

    My standard way of shooting – aperture priority, central focus spot only – seems to suit the X-10 perfectly well. It’s not wasting my time and patience with trying to outthink me all the time, and seems generally biddable!

    As far as I can see, the comments others have made about the RAW conversion software are valid – though it may simply be that it operates differently, and none of us have figured out how to exploit it properly. It’s certainly not as straightforward as the Alpha’s conversion software – and Elements 9 won’t go near the files!

    I have yet to try it under studio conditions (not what I bought it for, but it should hack it there). It’s definitely a camera that says “Carry me. Use me!” – so it’s been a good investment. Even if I will continue to carry bigger and heavier cameras a lot of the time!

  • Mike Z

    “Of course, raw files allow the freedom to make these changes post-capture.” — Not entirely true. You shouldn’t get sloppy just because you shoot RAW.

    “Average metering measures the entire scene to provide an average value.” — Not true either. It measures just the small portion in the center.

    Despite the RAW capture, your sample has wrong exposure and awful colors.

  • andre Bacquet

    my verdict after 4 months:
    camera & photos are excellent, BUT…
    software provided (silkypix): totally inadequate;
    even the built-in conversion facility is better, but only jpeg (no tiff)

  • alfred le pingouin

    pity the RAF (raw) conversion software is so inadequate (silkypix)! Even the built-in conversion software is better, but offers only jpeg (no tiff).
    my verdict after 4 months:
    very good camera, very poor raw exploitation.

  • Keith Crossland

    Impossible to read, as adverts obscure
    most of text.

  • ray ashworth

    great camera and “Oh my goodness” -an optical viewfinder! but to create the allround piece of kit that I need and always have,Fuji have shot themslves in the foot.They already have a 24mm facility and when they fit it to the X10 I will buy one.