Unconventional and completely new, the Ricoh GXR camera system may change the way we think about the relationship between cameras and sensors. Richard Sibley examines the new system

Product Overview

Overall rating:

Ricoh GXR

Product:

Ricoh GXR system review

Manufacturer:

Price as reviewed:

£750.00

Latest deal

Loading
TAGS:

White balance and colour

 

Image: The Ricoh GXR’s in-camera flash produces well-exposed images, even at close distances. This image was taken with the camera’s black & white mode, which has a nice level of contrast

Besides having a range of presets, as well as the obligatory AWB setting, there is a Multi-Point white balance setting. This is found on the latest range of Ricoh cameras and it compensates for different colour temperatures across a scene.

For example, it can be used when taking a portrait by a window in a tungsten-lit room, to make sure that the daylight and tungsten light are both rendered neutrally. Although I found that the Multi-Point white balance works, it is quite subtle, making only a small difference compared to a general AWB setting.

One surprising omission is a flash white balance setting. You would expect that an automatic flash setting would be applied when the pop-up flash was being used.

I found that in many images taken with AWB mode selected, the pop-up flash created a slightly blue tint. Also in AWB mode and with the built-in flash set to slow sync, the white balance seems to be biased towards the ambient light rather than the flash. Again, this results in a blue tint in the flash-exposed areas.

In daylight there is a slight difference between using the AWB and daylight settings, with the AWB again being slightly blue.

However, I found that while the daylight setting produces acceptable results, the tungsten setting still looks a little too orange/yellow.

Rather than using the Kelvin scale to set a manual white balance, the GXR has a scale with a lightbulb symbol at the bottom and a sun and cloud symbol at the top. There are 17 different settings on this scale and I found that under 100W tungsten lighting, the second-to-bottom setting was my preferred choice.

As the effects of changing the white balance are previewed live on the rear screen, it is easy to find or check  a suitable custom or manual white balance setting.

Overall, the colours produced by the GXR are good, although there is a tendency for blue skies to look a little cyan. However, as well as the usual selection of picture style effects, there are also two user-definable image styles.

These allow you to change the hue and saturation of individual colours, so you can adjust their appearance, including blue and cyan, to suit your own particular taste.

By increasing the contrast slightly and reducing the vividness of the orange, magenta and green, while increasing that of the blue and red colours, I was able to create a striking cross-processed effect.

  1. 1. Introduction
  2. 2. Features
  3. 3. Build and handling
  4. 4. Autofocus
  5. 5. Dynamic range
  6. 6. White balance and colour
  7. 7. Metering
  8. 8. Resolution, noise and sensitivity
  9. 9. LCD, Live View and video
  10. 10. Verdict
Page 6 of 10 - Show Full List
  • Johnsphotos

    I totally agree with your rating. I have been looking for a decent macro lens for the Canon 6D. This fits the bill. When we attached the lens. I took a portrait shot of my friend from 6ft away. Then I zoomed in on won of the eyes even hand held at that distance. You could see the blood veins. Reflection in the eyes as a mirror of the surroundings. I also chose Sigma because you do not have to by cases and hoods as extras. I did look at Canon and Tam ron equivilant models . They failed to impress as the Sigma lens did. Must dash I am off down the garden. To try it out on the roses and bumble bees.

  • SUBRAMONIAM

    I chose this lens after a long thought which one to choose. I’ve a SONY A580 that can take any lens. My wife has a NEX5 with LAEA1 A mount adaptor that needs SSM/SAM or lenses with in-built drives. Tamron 60mm that was a cheaper option did not guarantee operating with the NEX combo. Only option is this lens. Overall very pleased with the performance though test on NEX remains. A bit heavy though.

  • Hedo

    Does Sony version has OS inside or they removed it? Some says they removed the OS but some says no. Hmmm?

    I ordered this lens instead of Sony 100mm Macro, because it has better features, has the same price (due on summer sale), newer, and does not change in length. Did I make a good decision for this? 🙂

    Thanks.