There is nothing in post 9/11 law that restricts our rights to take photographs, argues a leading security expert in an article published in The Guardian.

There is nothing in post 9/11 law that restricts our rights to take photographs, argues a leading security expert in an article published in The Guardian.

The article, headlined: ?Since when did photography become a security threat?? was written by BT?s chief security technology officer Bruce Schneier.

Schneier stresses that photographers? rights to take pictures in public are worth fighting for and describes the perceived security threat as ?nonsense?.

He tells readers: ?Don?t propagate the terrorist-photographer story. Remind them that prohibiting photography was something we used to ridicule about the USSR. Eventually sanity will be restored, but it may take a while.?

To read the full article visit

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jun/05/news.terrorism

Amateur Photographer magazine has covered this subject extensively in recent months. For details see the articles below.

RELATED ARTICLES

Photo body launches rights card

Photo rights/BBC TV coverage

BBC article: photography and police

Photographers take fight to Home Office

Police pledge to act on photo fears

MP launches photography petition in House of Commons

Police in ‘deleted’ pictures storm

Anger at police statement on photography

Police apologise over Christmas lights fiasco