Hundreds of amateur and professional photographers are set to descend on Trafalgar Square tomorrow to defend their right to take pictures in public places.rnrn

See PICTURES AND STORY FROM THE PROTEST HERE

AP Rights Watch bannerSee PICTURES AND STORY FROM THE PROTEST HERE

Hundreds of amateur and professional photographers are set to descend on Trafalgar Square tomorrow to defend their right to take pictures in public places.

The ‘mass photo gathering’, starting at noon, is being organised by ‘I’m a Photographer, Not a Terrorist’, a group set up by professional photographers last year, in support of campaigns run by other photographic bodies including Amateur Photographer (AP) magazine and the British Journal of Photography.

The group’s founders include Jeff Moore, chairman of the British Press Photographers’ Association, and photographers Marc Vallée and Jess Hurd, both of whom have fallen victim to anti-terrorism legislation in recent years.

The event – which is not billed as an official ‘protest’ – follows a series of ‘high-profile detentions’ under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act, among them architectural photographer Grant Smith who inadvertently sparked a security alert in the City of London while taking harmless pictures of a church (Smith is helping to co-ordinate the gathering in Trafalgar Square).

The police swoop came just days after BBC photographer Jeff Overs told the Andrew Marr Show how his innocent picture of St Paul’s Cathedral led to him being stopped and quizzed near Tate Modern.

The plight of these photographers and others sparked mass media coverage over the past six weeks after in-depth investigations by several national newspapers.

But the documented experiences of amateur and professionals stretches back much further than that.

For example, in 2005 Amateur Photographer reported how one of its readers, Roy Jhuboo, was stopped and searched by anti-terror police while he was out taking pictures in east London.

Jhuboo was left stunned when two police vans ? containing up to eight officers – were called to Colt Street in Limehouse after he had been spotted taking pictures of a house during a walk from Tower Hill.

Police told Roy that he could have been on a ‘reconnaissance mission’ to launch a ‘rocket’ on nearby Canary Wharf.

Among the long line of amateur victims was John Kelly from Blackpool who said he was left humiliated and feeling like a criminal after police ordered him to delete his pictures.

The drama led to his appearance on BBC Breakfast News in 2008, alongside AP’s news editor who explained that the incident was far from an isolated one.

Last March AP quizzed the counter-terrorism minister in Parliament after more and more similar incidents came to light.

During the meeting – which was brokered by Labour MP Austin Mitchell – the minister said he would prepare guidelines to prevent similar incidents in future.

Despite his assurance there was no let up in police stops as the attitude of police on the ground remained unchanged.

Photographers welcomed, however, a recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights that police use of Section 44 Stop and Search anti-terrorism powers is unlawful.

The controversial Section 44 law allows police officers to stop and search people without grounds for suspicion.

However, the Home Office plans to appeal the decision and police chiefs have been told that stop and search counter-terrorism tactics remain in force nationwide.

Ahead of tomorrow’s event, which is expected to be peaceful, its organisers released a statement which reads: ‘Our society’s visual history is under threat of extinction by anti-terrorism legislation. Section 44 of the Terrorism Act has, in effect, ended the confidence of the citizen to engage in the act of photography in a public place as photographers, artists and illustrators – amateur and professional – are harassed by police invoking terrorism legislation to stop and search them.

‘The act of documenting our street scenes and public life, our built environment, whether iconic or not, is now considered to be an act of hostile reconnaissance and could result in the detention of the image maker.’

Amateur Photographer‘s news editor Chris Cheesman, who has reported on the controversy and the magazine’s subsequent ‘Rights Watch’ campaign will be among those attending tomorrow’s event alongside AP readers.

AP readers planning to attend can download an ‘AP Rights Watch’ logo’ here.

RELATED ARTICLES

365 photographers sign Sunday Telegraph plea letter

PHOTO CLIMATE ECHOES WARTIME BRITAIN?

Photographers should carry ID

Amateur arrested after taking pics in London suburb

AP meets counter-terrorism minister in Parliament

Photographer to complain against City police

Police crackdown on City photographers

Watch a recent More4 News report HERE

Watch a recent London Tonight report HERE

ITN film crew stopped while covering photo story

Terror swoop photographer lodges complaint against police

Photography in public campaign: Video by AP news editor

MP lodges new Commons petition

The Independent’s photo rights article

Sunday Telegraph interviews AP

Top Gear photographer blasts Met

Christmas lights terror stop

Photography in public campaign escalates

BBC photographer in terror stop

Police apology after Christmas lights fiasco

Jet ski photographer files complaint against police

Home Office publishes new guidance

Amateur photographer arrested

Terror police and photography: Know your rights

Met issues photography guidelines

Amateur Photographer magazine to help draft anti-terror guidance

Carlile report criticises terror law

Photographers ‘guilty’ until proved innocent

Lawyer speaks out about terror law threat

AP magazine requests stops and search data

Police stop and search powers to be cut

Government issues stop and search pledge.

Photographers face wider anti-terror curbs