Under-fire security firm G4S has issued a statement as London 2012 organisers are urged to clarify their policy following confusion over which cameras will be banned from Olympic venues.

As we reported last month, visitors face a ‘30cm’ limit on photographic equipment at London 2012 Olympic venues, under rules laid down by the organising committee.

Locog added: ‘You cannot use photographic or broadcast equipment for commercial purposes unless you hold media accreditation.’

Amateur Photographer (AP) understands that a key member of famed agency Magnum Photos is among those who fear the strict rules will limit photographers’ ability to record historic reportage-style shots from inside venues.

And confusion has resurfaced after an article published by BJP and ComputerActive magazines which claims that Wembley Stadium – set to host Olympic football events – will ban any ‘professional-style cameras [any cameras with interchangeable lenses] or recording/transmitting devices’.

This suggests that each venue may adopt its own policy and reignites the debate over Olympic rules following a series of conflicting statements issued to AP over the past 15 months.

AP first warned that DSLR lenses may be prohibited from Olympic venues in a report published in March 2011.

A Locog spokesperson had yet to respond to a request for comment, but suggested it is possible that Wembley may integrate its own policy within the Olympic organisers’ own rules.

A spokesperson for G4S, which is under fire after failing to deliver enough guards, referred AP to the 30cm limit already outlined by Locog.

The G4S spokesperson added: ‘Personal/private wireless access points and 3G hubs (smart devices such as Android phones, iPhone and tablets are permitted inside venues, but must not be used as wireless access points to connect multiple devices).’

Meanwhile, the British Security Industry Association (BSIA) says it will not be reissuing its photographers’ rights guidelines to security firms, despite several clashes involving photographers in recent months.

The BSIA drew up the guidelines last year, in preparation for London 2012, following talks between police, home office officials and photography campaigners including AP.

Though the BSIA says it has issued the rules to its member firms, it is unclear how Olympic security provider G4S has communicated these to individual staff on the ground.

The G4S spokesperson failed to address this point when approached by AP.

The spokesperson said: ‘Anyone is entitled to take photographs unimpeded from public land.

‘Inside the venues, members of the public are encouraged not to photograph G4S security staff at work (this includes the media).

‘However, if an individual is on public land they should not be prevented from recording images.’

Asked whether the BSIA would be reissuing the rules ahead of the Games, a spokeswoman said: ‘From a BSIA perspective, there are no plans to re-launch the BSIA’s guidance relating to photography and hostile reconnaissance.

‘The guidelines have been issued to all members via a range of channels, for them to cascade to individual security officers, and [they] also remain publicly available on our website at http://www.bsia.co.uk/web_images//publications/form_122.pdf

  • planta fruta

    I did not get any of the weird side affects that some users report. I have tried using many many products that promise so much and deliver so little. This is not a single of them. It is a great supplement that worked great for me. Obviously it will not likely work for everyone, no product does. Different body, different final results. I lost the last little bit of fat around my midsection. I cannot give it enough praise. I highly propose trying this product to see if it works for you. planta fruta http://www.migente.com/lidacapsules14/

  • Jon Bristol

    Everyone can relax – there won’t be any security staff there to enforce it anyway!

  • David Hoffman

    We’re worried about how security staff will treat photographers at EPUK too. AP readers lucky enough to have one of their handy lens cloths setting out the law should make sure they have it handy!

    We’ve written about G4S today here http://bit.ly/G4Sucks and there’s a useful legal guide link at the end.

  • Thomas Noble

    The folk who are ‘in Charge’ of this Olympics Saga have managed to make the whole event a great big laughing stock joke. From the (O)lympic Cafe situation, to the correct water to drink, to the wrong cash card through to using your ‘Professional’ looking camera, not forgetting the ticketing joke, it is all a farce. I assume that if a spectator turns up wearing the wrong trainers, they will either be asked to remove them, or have to take part in the heats! It makes the Twenty Twelve TV programme almost look like serious drama.The people ‘in charge’ could not have done a better job at turning us ordinary folk completely of the sad Olympics saga. I cannot wait for it to finish.

  • SIMON LAMBERT

    Maybe G4S are worried pictures of people rolling on the floor laughing at their incompetence will circulate – oh sorry they already have at the House of Commons grilling of their Chief executive!

  • mike the photographer

    if you have the Olympus SZ-30MR (compact camera) it has a x 24 zoom and 16m.m.p and image stabelisation. This will take close up images of pro quality you could sell. it just shows they don’t have a clue about photography equipment

  • Macjim

    There’s going to be an awful lot of people that are going to be p++++d off when they go to an event and are then banned from taking there camera in with them. So, basically, you’ll need either a mobile phone, a point and shoot, or a super zoom pocket camera to be able to shoot at the events. Glad I’m not going to any events!