1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Wow!! I have try this

Discussion in 'Talking Pictures' started by Tooslow, Jun 12, 2013.

  1. Tooslow

    Tooslow Well-Known Member

  2. RovingMike

    RovingMike Crucifixion's a doddle...

    Amazing, but I think we'd tire of them very quickly.
     
  3. TimHeath

    TimHeath Well-Known Member

    Interesting but I wouldn't want one on the wall.
     
  4. PeteRob

    PeteRob Well-Known Member

    horrid! Just 'cos you can doesn't mean you should but beauty is in the eye of ... etc.
     
  5. Learning

    Learning Ethelred the Ill-Named

    These are what I call faked photos. You can't do this sort of thing in Lightroom. I am coming to the conclusion that the boundary between good taste and bad taste in post processing is the boundary between what is possible in Lightroom and what needs Photoshop.
    That seems quotable.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2013
  6. velocette

    velocette Well-Known Member

    I quite like it but just how long I would continue to do so might be a point. 10/10 for effort though.
     
  7. Roger_Provins

    Roger_Provins Well-Known Member

    I'd seen enough of them by the time I'd scrolled to the end of the page:(
     
  8. George W Johnson

    George W Johnson Well-Known Member

    My thoughts too, nice effect and a bit of fun but I must admit I was bored already by the 3rd picture!

    ( I must be getting old! )
     
  9. P_Stoddart

    P_Stoddart Well-Known Member

    Interest effect. But like HDR pushes photography more towards graphic art.

    In some cases the effect is abit sickly on the eye. :(

    I find the 3rd one quite pleasing. :)
     
  10. Barney

    Barney Well-Known Member

    The boundary between photography and graphic art is what can be achieved in Lightroom and what needs Photoshop, and I've been saying just that for a long time.
     

Share This Page