Any Wildlife/Natural History photographers amongst us? Wonder what your feelings are on photographing animals/birds with human intervention ie feeding and passing it off as a Natural History shot? It's one area I've never tried but if I did and did research areas to go and wait patiently for 'that' shot or not as I imagine the case often to be, I'd be pretty miffed to open a publication only to see 'farmed' animals/birds passed off as natural history shots. Also wondering if an animal lives in the wild but was hand reared or tamed to come on call with food, would be a Natural History shot? As a viewer I at least like to look at shots and think they are truthful but current trend seems it's not always the case. Perhaps this has always gone on, I know it has in other genres. Any way just wondering what others thoughts are on this?