Leica V-Lux4 v Lumix FZ200 Hi, I can see no material difference between these two cameras. Maybe the odd item of finish but nothing that translates into different performance. The Leica comes with Photoshop Lightroom 4, wheras the Lumix doesn't (but I've got Lightroom 4 anyway). I also understand that Leica have tweaked the image processing firmware. However, if I shoot in RAW there won't be any difference, will there? The bottom line I guess is, apart from some slight cosmetic differences, Lightroom 4 and some tweks to the image processing, what else could possibly justify the difference in price £390 (with £50 cashback) v £690? Is the little red dot really that valuable? Does anyone have any experience of the direct comparison of any other Lumix/Leica clones?