1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Fuji set to debut £1,000 portrait lens

Discussion in 'News - Discussion' started by CSBC, Jan 6, 2014.

  1. CSBC

    CSBC RIP (News Editor)

  2. IvorCamera

    IvorCamera Well-Known Member

    They can keep it, there is no such thing as a portrait lens, and a thousand quid that's a nice holiday for two in Spain........
     
  3. Roger Hicks

    Roger Hicks Well-Known Member

    Most of the great Hollywood portraitists would argue with that; so would owners of Thambars, Imagons, SF Fujinons and more.

    Cheers,

    R.
     
  4. Benchista

    Benchista Which Tyler

    Indeed; there most certainly are portrait lenses - the only falsehood would be in pretending that no other lenses could be used for portraits.
     
  5. Roger Hicks

    Roger Hicks Well-Known Member

    Dear Nick,

    Very true, but is anyone pretending that?

    Historically, most specialist portrait lenses have sold very badly, so a high price for this one is no surprise.

    Cheers,

    R.
     
  6. El_Sid

    El_Sid Well-Known Member

    It's one of those chicken and egg situation isn't it?... Are they a high price because they sell badly or do they sell badly because they are a high price?:rolleyes:
     
  7. Roger Hicks

    Roger Hicks Well-Known Member

    Dear Nigel,

    To a certain extent you are of course right, but equally, how many people care enough about portraiture to buy a special portrait lens at any price? For the manufacturers it must surely be a reasonable assumption that you won't sell many, at which point, the price needs to be fairly high in order to make it worth making any.

    Cheers,

    R.
     
  8. IvorCamera

    IvorCamera Well-Known Member

    There is no such thing as a portrait lens, and I will never be a great American photographer! However a nice lens for taking portraits with is between small format 85mm and 105mm, larger format 150mm lens, but really you can take great portraits with any lens! In this day and age who would pay a £1000 for a lens just to take mugshots with?
     
  9. Roger Hicks

    Roger Hicks Well-Known Member

    No-one. But someone who wanted to take portraits, rather than mugshots, might be interested.

    Cheers,

    R.
     
  10. IvorCamera

    IvorCamera Well-Known Member

    Mugsots whoops! I have a nice portrait in my passport it looks just like me! The cost? Just a £1
     
  11. El_Sid

    El_Sid Well-Known Member

    'Portrait lens' is one of those slapdash shorthand phrases but it is quicker to say than 'short to medium telephoto lens combining a fast aperture for depth of field control with a smooth and pleasing bokeh'... ;)
     
  12. Terrywoodenpic

    Terrywoodenpic Well-Known Member

    I would like to know more about the control available on this lens. Past Portrait lens have given you the ability to control spherical aberration for a defined sharpness while maintaining tonal separation.

    This enables the use of lighting to define shape with out excessive texture.
    However most modern portraitists use soft overall bland lighting that destroys all sense of shape depth and contour in a face, and so may have no use for such a lens.
     
  13. nimbus

    nimbus Well-Known Member

    Results reminiscent of those captured with film. Personally I can think of a far cheaper method of achieving this and authentically!:rolleyes:
     
  14. Roger Hicks

    Roger Hicks Well-Known Member

    Quite a lot of people take the viewpoint that "I don't want this therefore nobody needs it", whether we're talking about fast lenses, extreme telephotos, high ISOs, long-range zooms, extreme wide-angles, even film.

    This is however the first time I've encountered "I don't want this therefore it doesn't exist", or possibly "I don't understand this therefore it doesn't exist".

    This all makes it pretty clear why it's going to be expensive: not many people are likely want it, especially those who can't distinguish between a portrait and a mug shot or passport picture, or for that matter those who favour a different kind of portraiture, such as environmental portraits with a standard lens or wide-angle.

    Would I buy one? No, because I already have a couple of soft-focus lenses I like very well for portraiture on 35mm/24x36m digital, namely a 100mm Dreamagon and a 90mm Thambar, and I have a 21 inch uncoated Ross Anastigmat I like very well on 8x10 inch. I don't use them very much, because I am no great enthusiast of portraiture, nor am I very good at it. But anyone who can't see the difference between the effects produced by these lenses and those produced by (say) a standard zoom, probably can't see much.

    Cheers,

    R.
     
  15. IvorCamera

    IvorCamera Well-Known Member

    A portrait lens=A short telephoto lens=£1000.......A landscape lens=£???....A wildlife lens=£???...
     
  16. Roger Hicks

    Roger Hicks Well-Known Member

    Well,quite.

    Cheers,

    R.
     
  17. daft_biker

    daft_biker Action Man!

    Indeed. Spending £2000 on a 70-200/2.8 seems to be the way a lot of folk go these days.
     
  18. GeoffR

    GeoffR Well-Known Member

    Given that the Nikon 105 f2 AF-D DC could be classed as a "portrait" lens I see nothing wrong with Fuji expecting to sell these lenses at £1,000. OK so the Nikon is "only" £799 and I paid less than that for mine but just because it has the defocus control doesn't mean it isn't also an excellent 105mm general purpose lens.
     
  19. Paul_Reading

    Paul_Reading Well-Known Member

    This lens has been designed to give a short depth of field, which is hard with the small sensor sizes of digital cameras. I think this is going to be a superb lens for taking portraits, especially in low light situations and weddings.

    If you are a doing a lot of weddings or portraits this would soon pay for itself, but are any professional using Fuji X series cameras?
     
  20. IvorCamera

    IvorCamera Well-Known Member

    I have a 105 Micro Nikkor lens, I have had this lens for years, as it name suggests this lens was bought for close up work which does the biz! however I have often used this lens for portraiture again with really good results, is this a portrait lens no its not, its a close focusing lens, I also have a 50mm 1.8 standard lens it cost £89.00 new its as good as any other lens to take portaits with. Would I spend a £1000 on a portrait lens (short telephoto) no I would not that amount would be better spent on 2 weeks in Spain!
     

Share This Page