Am I being precious? Current kit 5D with 24-105 L, and 135 f2.0 L lenses, and Epson R2400 printer. I've been thinking of going longer, and was looking at the 70-200f/4.0 L, but then I tought "I've already got 135, so.." I checked Mifsuds, and they do the 200 f/2.8 L for very little more than the cheepest 70-200. So will I notice any improvement over the zoom? Do I need it? Most of my prints are at A4 at the moment but will be goiing to A3 shortly. Am I being precious / pretentious / pointlessly perfectionist in going for "L" lenses or would the 70-300 f4.5/5.6 do? BTW I've also got the 100mm Macro on my shopping list. and that's not "L" Cheers, Dave
Previous
Index
Next
Flat
Zoom or Prime or...?
Edit
Reply
Quote
