Amateur Photographer Magazine

Skip to Content

The world's number one weekly photography magazine

Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource
You are not logged in.
Login | New user registration 		Main Index | Search | Active Topics | Who's Online | FAQ / HELP

Community >> The Lounge
Previous thread Previous   View all threads Index   Next thread Next   Flat Mode Flat  

 |  Print Thread
Burgy
Grateful not to have one


Reged: 13/04/2001
Posts: 5437
Loc: This far, from beating 7 shade...
Re: Scottish refendum - why not?
      06/05/2008 21:54

Surely as it was developed by (originally english companies) and subsidised with Southerners Tax money it should be London and Surrey Oil and Gas fields??

--------------------
Cheers


Burgy BSRIPN, BSc, DSO and Bar (now open 24/7).
it's not what you've got, its who you do it to

http://togsblog.wordpress.com

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Scottish refendum - why not? Malcolm_Stewart 06/05/2008 17:47
. * * Re: Scottish referendum - why not? Malcolm_Stewart   08/05/2008 15:35
. * * Re: Scottish referendum - why not? Bawbee   08/05/2008 19:11
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Bawbee   06/05/2008 19:16
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? AGW   07/05/2008 20:14
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Benchmark   08/05/2008 14:27
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Barney   06/05/2008 19:46
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Bawbee   06/05/2008 20:34
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Barney   06/05/2008 22:39
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Burgy   06/05/2008 21:05
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Bawbee   06/05/2008 21:27
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Burgy   06/05/2008 21:55
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Bawbee   06/05/2008 21:56
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? huwevans   06/05/2008 21:51
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Burgy   06/05/2008 21:54
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Bawbee   06/05/2008 22:02
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Garry McNamara   06/05/2008 22:36
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Barney   06/05/2008 22:54
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? colin343   07/05/2008 14:49
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Bawbee   06/05/2008 22:41
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Garry McNamara   06/05/2008 22:46
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Burgy   06/05/2008 22:43
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Barney   06/05/2008 18:05
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? mjc7uk   06/05/2008 18:26
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? beejaybee   06/05/2008 18:35
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? SqueamishOssifrage   06/05/2008 18:04
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? LargeFormat   06/05/2008 17:52
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? Malcolm_Stewart   06/05/2008 18:28
. * * Re: Scottish refendum - why not? sey   06/05/2008 18:35

Extra information
0 registered and 10 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, Fen, Siuya, TheFatControlleR, Benchista, Mat Gallagher, Damien Demolder, AndrewC, lisadb, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R, Mike Lowe, Nigel Atherton, OneTen, Hotblack, hhmr 


Print Thread
Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 1578

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.026 seconds in which 0.006 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression disabled.