Amateur Photographer Magazine

Skip to Content
Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource
You are not logged in.
Login | New user registration 		Main Index | Search | Active Topics | Who's Online | FAQ / HELP

Equipment >> Leica Camera Chat
Previous thread Previous   View all threads Index   Next thread Next   Flat Mode Flat  

 |  Print Thread
PeteE
addict


Reged: 23/08/2005
Posts: 401
Loc: BRENTWOOD,Essex
Re: M- Lens Classifications
      02/10/2007 20:25

I have a 1986 M6 with a 35mm f1.4 Canadian Summilux, a 50mm f2 Summicron bought new and a 1957 f4 collapsible Elmar. The 35mm suffers badly from coma at f1.4 and at that aperture is very soft. I keep the Elmar un-collapsed or the locking mechanism dosen't work properly. It is sharp OK. The Summicron is no better than my Pentax 50mm f1.4 or 1.7 lenses.

--------------------
Got COMPUTERISED at last and now Digitised but FILM still RULES!

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* M- Lens Classifications photogeek 02/10/2007 17:12
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications bagpuss   30/11/2007 07:07
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications Ploy   30/11/2007 11:03
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications hhmr   01/12/2007 12:50
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications mike_j   01/12/2007 21:28
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications hhmr   02/12/2007 17:35
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications mike_j   02/12/2007 19:19
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications hhmr   02/12/2007 20:13
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications mike_j   02/12/2007 21:25
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications bagpuss   04/12/2007 09:49
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications mike_j   08/12/2007 19:56
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications BrianT   02/10/2007 19:23
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications PeteE   02/10/2007 20:25
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications Mark_Norton   02/10/2007 22:04
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications BrianT   03/10/2007 08:10
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications Mark_Norton   03/10/2007 09:02
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications TimF   03/10/2007 13:51
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications BrianT   03/10/2007 09:36
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications BenchistaModerator   03/10/2007 13:57
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications topoxforddoc   03/10/2007 21:52
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications BrianT   04/10/2007 09:53
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications topoxforddoc   05/10/2007 22:31
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications TimF   06/10/2007 08:57
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications BrianT   06/10/2007 11:41
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications Mark_Norton   06/10/2007 12:25
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications BrianT   06/10/2007 14:27
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications photogeek   04/10/2007 12:05
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications TimF   03/10/2007 13:46
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications photogeek   03/10/2007 08:20
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications TimF   03/10/2007 08:49
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications BrianT   03/10/2007 09:21
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications TimF   03/10/2007 13:44
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications Mark_Norton   03/10/2007 09:28
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications Mark_Norton   03/10/2007 09:12
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications photogeek   03/10/2007 09:59
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications bagpuss   04/10/2007 07:52
. * * Re: M- Lens Classifications TimF   03/10/2007 08:54

Extra information
0 registered and 2 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, GCW, Siuya, huwevans, Benchista, Fen, TheFatControlleR, Damien Demolder, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R 


Print Thread
Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 5312

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.024 seconds in which 0.005 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression disabled.