+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Pentax 35mm f/2.4

  1. #1
    AP Editor Damien_Demolder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Essex born and badly-bred
    Posts
    2,151

    Pentax 35mm f/2.4

    .
    See my photographs at www.wordsonpictures.com
    .

  2. #2
    Senior Member Zou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    4,521

    Re: Pentax 35mm f/2.4

    I assume the UK will only get it in black - 12 colours for the lens will be available on the Japanese market.

  3. #3
    Senior Member DaveS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Acton, West London.
    Posts
    1,412

    Re: Pentax 35mm f/2.4

    But. . . .Why?
    On APS-C it's only standard, and f/2.4 is a bit meh for a standard lens.
    Even covering 35mm a 35mm f/2.4 is hardly fast.
    Now. if it was a 35 f/1.4, that would be worth shouting about.
    Dave

  4. #4
    Which Tyler Benchista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere, baby
    Posts
    46,517

    Re: Pentax 35mm f/2.4

    It's cheap. It's light. And if it's as good as my favourite 35mm f2.4, it'll be good.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North London
    Posts
    755

    Re: Pentax 35mm f/2.4

    The timing of this being announced makes life a little complicated for me. I'd just found a place that's still selling the FA 35mm F2 new for about £300 and was on the point of buying one to give me a standard lens view on digital with fixed focal length quality. And half a stop of speed over this new lens, with all that means in terms of light gathering and control over depth of field.

    Sometimes life has too many choices.
    Martin

    The observed defines the observer

  6. #6
    Senior Member Wheelu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    UK, up North
    Posts
    1,239

    Re: Pentax 35mm f/2.4

    The timing of this being announced makes life a little complicated for me. I'd just found a place that's still selling the FA 35mm F2 new for about £300 and was on the point of buying one to give me a standard lens view on digital with fixed focal length quality.

    I bought a copy of the 35mm f2 Samsung variant - called the D-Xenogon - presumably the same lens? However I paid less than £200 new, from memory circa £170. It is a very good lens indeed. I would shop around a bit!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Bucks
    Posts
    6,630

    Re: Pentax 35mm f/2.4

    Given that the diagonal of a 35mm film frame is around 42mm I have recently resurrected a Sigma 28 f1.8 lens. It appears, from a few shots on the D2H to be a good choice for a fast standard lens on an APS-C DSLR.

    The Pentax offering equates to a 50mm on a film SLR which is a useful general purpose lens, if a little slower than we have become accustomed to. That said, I remember my first "Wide angle" lens was a 35 f2.8 and I didn't think that was slow.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2

    Re: Pentax 35mm f/2.4

    Damien, can you confirm that the lens is FF compatible? Not heard it mentioned or written anywhere else!

  9. #9
    Senior Member Zou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    4,521

    Re: Pentax 35mm f/2.4

    It is designated as DA which is designed for APS-C size sensors. Whilst some of the higher end DAs do apparently cover the full 35mm format, I would think it highly unlikely that such a cheap lens would be designed to cover the larger format.

  10. #10
    AP Editor Damien_Demolder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Essex born and badly-bred
    Posts
    2,151

    Re: Pentax 35mm f/2.4

    Damien, can you confirm that the lens is FF compatible? Not heard it mentioned or written anywhere else!
    Sorry, my mistake (make a note and take a picture, it doesn't happen very often ).

    DA lenses are designed for 'Pentax digital SLRs', which of course are all APS-C. If you have an MZ-7 you'll be able to control the apertures and you'll have AF etc, but at wide apertures the lens will probably not cover the whole film frame. Sometimes stopping down improves the coverage, but not always. I haven't been able to try this lens yet, so we should assume that it doesn't cover until we can check.

    apologies
    .
    See my photographs at www.wordsonpictures.com
    .

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts