I think I might have solved my printer problems! I was debating the pros and cons of buying printer profiles instead of using the generic profile provided by Canon but some folk seemed to think this wasn't necessary. I wasn't sure and I thought I would do some research.
I discovered that a professional photography magazine had surveyed six A3 printers and discovered that none of them produced good prints using their generic profiles. All of them performed better when printer profiles were created specifically for them. I thought this was the way I should go because I was wasting a lot of money on ink and paper and a small sum on a profile could be a good investment. I looked at some of the people offering profiles but some were expensive and some were in America! One site said that they would not accept telephone calls about their profiles and this seemed a little odd.
I finally located a firm that seemed to be reasonable and only charged £14 per printer profile. This firm was www.hermitage-ps.co.uk and it is possible to 'phone them and speak to an expert on all forms of printing. I had to send them two A4 prints of a downloaded test chart and I received a profile next day and it seems to work!
I did have to 'phone twice to discuss some of the problems I was having and they were extremely helpful. I can thoroughly recommend them.
My prints have now taken on a new life and look more 'vibrant' and true to the monitor image. I feel that at last I can now do my own prints without having to depend on outside printers - and it can be cost effective once you start printing A3. What more can I say?
An advantage of having specific printer profiles aimed at a particular combination of printer, photo paper and inks is that you could have several different profiles for several different combinations. I was thinking of trying an Ilford paper designed for dye based inks and I could have a profile made. I suppose you could always buy a Gretag Macbeth kit but it would cost over £1000 and you could have ten profiles created for £140. It would seem to be the best and cheapest way to go.


Reply With Quote