![]()
I bought my Canonet GIII QL 34 years ago. QL stands for Quick Load – you only have to insert the cassette, place the tail of the film across the film gate and close the back. Three pumps of the wind on lever and you were ready to go, a small window at the back showing via a vibrating indicator that the film was in fact moving. My first SLR (an AE1) was frankly a pig to load and in this way at least was a major come down from the GIII.
The camera is fully manual – apart from the metering which relies on a mercury battery that is no longer available. I believe that one can get it re-calibrated for modern batteries but I will just rely on an external meter for the rare occasion when I want to use film. Metering is standard shutter priority with a needle in the viewfinder showing the aperture selected. The viewfinder is “bright frame” showing the area just out of shot (very useful) and is parallax corrected as the focussing distance varies.
Having the shutter in the lens itself means the camera is flash synchronised at all speeds (1/4 to 1/500 sec plus B) which in turn means that fill in flash is (fairly) easy to use. Talking of flash the Canonlite D was fully coupled with the camera - set the aperture to auto and if the flash is attached the aperture is varied according to the focussing distance
Some descriptions say that the lens is prone to develop fungus, however mine seems perfectly clear.
What is it good at?
Small, light, with a very fast high quality lens, and near silent it could be hung unobtrusively around my neck and take pictures almost anywhere. In those days I was heavily involved with our local PTA and I became the semi-official school photographer, taking pictures at all the school plays and fetes, the selling the prints on behalf of the PTA. Nowadays I think that’s banned so the PTA has lost a useful source of income.
It was not just PTA events - I also did shots at family parties – here is a snatched shot of one of my cousins.
![]()
Could it be improved?
Within its class I do not think so, some people compare it unfavourable to the Leica CL which had interchangeable lenses, but to go down that route would have lost the high speed flash sync.
All in all, a little beauty.


Reply With Quote
