+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

  1. #1
    Junior Member StevenJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    24

    Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    Having had my first foray into medium format, I am stuck with the film holder.

    Tha camera is a second hand Mamiya 645 from the 1980's, in mint condition.

    It has a "220" film holder, but no 120 fil holder.

    Now, I loaded a 120 film on the holder, ran it through, but the problem is on the "220" film holder, the winding mechanism doesn't go slack until after 30 exposures, unlike the 120, where it goes slack at 15 exposures.

    Does anyone know what the difference is in the holders, can I modify the holder I have, or where can I source a 120 holder from?

    Otherwise I guess the only solution is to use the "220" holder, wait until I reach 16 exposures, and then keep winding & exposing the paper trail........

    Anyone any ideas?

    Many thanks

    S

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Exeter, Devon (and Somerset sometimes)
    Posts
    1,884

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    Ffordes have a number of Mamiya 645 120 inserts at £10 - 15.
    Mifsuds have them at £29. MXV have several at £11 - 20.

    Ffordes
    Mifsuds
    MXV

    I think some of the smaller secondhand dealers who advertise in the back of AP also list them from time to time.

  3. #3
    'Two Breakfasts' OneTen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    4,715

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    Hi Steven, 120 film uses backing paper along the length of the film whereas 220 film doesn't. To compensate for this 220 film holders use a pressure plate that narrows the gap. Running a 120 film through this may result in the film being scratched.

    120 film holders are usually easy to find at dealers like Ffordes or MXV or on eBay.
    Richard...


    My Flickr | My Website | My Blog

  4. #4
    Junior Member StevenJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    24

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    thanks guys.

    As an engineer, I should know better than not use the correct tools for the job! I didn't howver know there was a difference between 120/220 film holder, or even what to ask for.

    I will look up the websites kindly provided and purchase the correct holder before running another film through the camera.

    thanks,

    Steven

  5. #5
    Member GeoffC's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Posts
    566

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    Running a 120 film through this may result in the film being scratched.

    Mmmm, it shouldn't do, as it's the paper backing that would be in contact with the pressure plate, and the only points of contact on the emulsion side would be outside of the image area anyway.
    Geoff

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Exeter, Devon (and Somerset sometimes)
    Posts
    1,884

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    However, there could be issues with the film advance / frame spacing, due to the thicker 120 film + paper backing.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,221

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    My 645 is loaded at present, but I seem to recall the obvious difference between the 120 and 220 film holders was a small part screwed onto one (I am unable to remember which) that acted on a part in the body or back to adjust the film stop for 15 or 30 exposures. I did have a 220 holder but found it was prone to leak light onto the film. If the part is screwed onto the 220 holder it's removal MAY render it suitable for 120 use.

  8. #8
    Junior Member StevenJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    24

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    While the original query has been answered, and I have ordered an insert from Ffordes, I do wonder if someone could help with this;

    the size of the image on the negative is 6x4.5cm.

    I have a viewfinder where I look down into the camera from the top, and I am sure that the image is more square than 6x4.5cm

    is the view through the finder really what I would expect on the negative?

    As you can tell, I am completely new to Medium Format - but I'm trying to give it a serious go

    regards

    Steven

  9. #9
    'Two Breakfasts' OneTen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    4,715

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    Hi Steven, you should be seeing the 6x4.5 image in the viewfinder, maybe the previous owner has masked it off to a square. Try taking the waist level finder off and having a look. There are two small buttons to depress to remove it. The actual size of the negative is something like 56x42mm, so just a little smaller than 6x4.5cm.
    Richard...


    My Flickr | My Website | My Blog

  10. #10
    Senior Member Benchmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sedgefield, Co Durham
    Posts
    3,441

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    Having had my first foray into medium format, I am stuck with the film holder.

    Tha camera is a second hand Mamiya 645 from the 1980's, in mint condition.

    It has a "220" film holder, but no 120 fil holder.

    Now, I loaded a 120 film on the holder, ran it through, but the problem is on the "220" film holder, the winding mechanism doesn't go slack until after 30 exposures, unlike the 120, where it goes slack at 15 exposures.

    Does anyone know what the difference is in the holders, can I modify the holder I have, or where can I source a 120 holder from?

    Otherwise I guess the only solution is to use the "220" holder, wait until I reach 16 exposures, and then keep winding & exposing the paper trail........

    Anyone any ideas?

    Many thanks

    S
    Hi Steven,
    The 120 and 220 film holders are different, as you have already found.

    Firstly, there is a small plate on the 220 holder that can be removed so the camera winds on after 15, rather than 30 exposures when using the auto winder.

    However, the main difference, as others have pointed out, is that the pressure plate is different on the 220 backs, having milled edges to accommodate the thinner 220 film, and to hold it flat.

    From what I can see, if you were to use 120 film in the 220 holder the film plane would be positioned slightly too far forward, and would possibly affect focus at wide apertures. In this respect, don't forget that medium format has a shallower depth of field than 35 mm or APS.
    Nigel CRIPN and Bar

    Beware of the Dark Slide

  11. #11
    Junior Member StevenJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    24

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film Holder and operation

    HI Nigel,

    I have just purchased by post a 120 film holder, and it has already arrived. I noticed the plate oyu mention straight away, thanks.

    I'll wait and see just how my first folm through turns out, I will be picking it up today - but in future - I'll be using the 120 holder, unless there is no discernable difference - in which case I may use them both.

    thanks,

    Steven

  12. #12
    Junior Member StevenJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    24

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film operation

    not sure if anyone can offer more advice on this, the second film I got developped (after using the 120 film holder this time) was also completely unexposed, despite it passing through the camera. I know it passed through the camera for sure becuase I made a note of the reel the filw was on before closing the back.

    Is there some switch or setting that stopps the shutter being fired on this camera?

    I thought I was pretty good at figuring things like this out - but this has me stumped.

  13. #13
    Which Tyler Benchista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere, baby
    Posts
    46,513

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film operation

    Are you sure you loaded the film the right way round and didn't just expose the backing paper?

  14. #14
    Junior Member StevenJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    24

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film operation

    that is where my inexperience comes in.

    I didn't even know that the backing papaer went the length of the film. I though that maybe just the leader and the end section might have been paper.

    This is a very strong possibility.......

  15. #15
    Marvin beejaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Really Here In Name Only
    Posts
    8,937

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film operation

    Is there some switch or setting that stopps the shutter being fired on this camera?
    Stupid question, but did you open the blind that protects the film when changing the back?
    If you're not living on the edge, you're wasting space

  16. #16
    Junior Member StevenJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    24

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film operation

    the 645M, you can't actually change the back. You open the door, and remove the film holder, load and replace.

  17. #17
    Which Tyler Benchista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere, baby
    Posts
    46,513

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film operation

    that is where my inexperience comes in.

    I didn't even know that the backing papaer went the length of the film. I though that maybe just the leader and the end section might have been paper.

    This is a very strong possibility.......
    That's true for 220, but not 120, which is still pretty much as it was when cameras had red windows on the back and you wound on by watching for the number printed on the backing paper. They're still printed there...

    I suggest this because as an M645 user, I can't think of any other obvious problem. Assuming the shutter is opening and the mirror lifting, there should otherwise be some sort of image - the camera is pretty basic, after all. I hope that's all it is.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Benchmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sedgefield, Co Durham
    Posts
    3,441

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film operation

    I assume the 645M uses the same film holder as the later cameras with removable film backs?

    When you load the film onto the holder, the black side of the backing paper should face outwards, whilst the white or coloured side will face in to the film holder itself.

    Let me know if you would like a pic of a loaded film holder.

    On the later models, the dark slide interlock can sometimes fail, which led me to make a dozen blank exposures half way up Roseberry Topping one cold and frosty morning.
    Nigel CRIPN and Bar

    Beware of the Dark Slide

  19. #19
    Which Tyler Benchista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere, baby
    Posts
    46,513

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film operation

    I assume the 645M uses the same film holder as the later cameras with removable film backs?
    Yup.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Benchmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sedgefield, Co Durham
    Posts
    3,441

    Re: Mamiya 645 Film operation

    To help illustrate correct film loading, I have uploaded three photographs showing the 645 film holder with a new roll of Portra.

    I appologise the for quality of the pix, which I grabbed quickly this afternoon, but I hope these at least show how I think it should be done.




    1) This is the rear of the holder. Note the yellow backing paper and markings. The film has been advanced to the start position. If you can see black paper or film here, you have it the wrong way around!





    2) This is the top of the film holder. Note the film routing from beneath the top roll. Also note that the coloured paper and markings are showing on the outside of the roll.





    3) This is the business end of the film holder which faces the lens. Note that the black side of the backing paper must face the lens! If you can see coloured paper or numbers this side you will be shooting blanks!



    Finally, it may be worth removing the lens, and opening the shutter on the B position to make sure that the shutter is actually working, and that you can see the film (and not the backing paper) through the camera.

    I hope that helps.
    Nigel CRIPN and Bar

    Beware of the Dark Slide

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts