+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 61 to 63 of 63

Thread: WHO WANTS IN-CAMERA POST-CAPTURE PROCESSING?

  1. #61
    Senior Member Wheelu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    UK, up North
    Posts
    1,238

    Re: WHO WANTS IN-CAMERA POST-CAPTURE PROCESSING?

    It's called polaroid isn't it - and they've just given up on the idea.

    Can't see any use for it and certainly don't want to have to pay for it.

  2. #62
    Senior Member Terrywoodenpic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Saddleworth UK
    Posts
    1,752

    Re: WHO WANTS IN-CAMERA POST-CAPTURE PROCESSING?

    I say No...
    Though as it can be done... so it will be done...
    I just wish that camera makers would concentrate on things that improve the basics.
    for canon that should mean more and better IF lenses.
    65 happy photo years from amateur to professional and back. Caught the bug Young.

  3. #63
    Member Adesw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    821

    Re: WHO WANTS IN-CAMERA POST-CAPTURE PROCESSING?

    I want better lenses, better tonal ranger shutter speeds colours etc etc.

    I don't want in camera processing. How can you process an image properly on a 2 inch screen? I know I can't.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts