Amateur Photographer Magazine

Skip to Content

The world's number one weekly photography magazine

Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource

Technical Discussions: Film >> Traditional Capture
 |  Print Topic
Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
johnnopc
newbie


Reged: 25/08/2008
Posts: 43
to push or not to push
      #763580 - 20/02/2009 12:53

hi everyone,
i am going to london soon and plan to take pictures in the british museum with my ensign ful-vue (box camera). having been there before i know that the light levels will be low in there, 1/30 at f/2.8 with 400 speed film in most areas. however i have a small stock of high speed black and white film ( ilford delta 3200). I believe with the fixed speed and aperature of the camera i will generally under exposing by 1 stop.
will i be better leaving my pictures under exposed by one stop or getting the film push processed. i don't process/print myself and will be sending off the film.
thanks
ian.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Gordon_McGeachie
Joke Historian


Reged: 19/01/2007
Posts: 4854
Loc: East Yorkshire,
Re: to push or not to push [Re: johnnopc]
      #763639 - 20/02/2009 15:56

You may find that using a speed of 3200 in doors without flash should be okay

--------------------
She (Avro Vulcan XH558) Took To The Sky Like A Lovesick Angel.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BenchistaModerator
Which Tyler


Reged: 11/08/2000
Posts: 42183
Loc: Everywhere and nowhere, baby
Re: to push or not to push [Re: Gordon_McGeachie]
      #763643 - 20/02/2009 15:58

Only thing is that it's not a true 3200 film anyway, and is already being pushed to reach that speed. But there are so many variables at work that it's really hard to predict what might be best.

--------------------
Nick

www.nbrphoto.com

Light and Shade II - the new blog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Gordon_McGeachie
Joke Historian


Reged: 19/01/2007
Posts: 4854
Loc: East Yorkshire,
Re: to push or not to push [Re: Benchista]
      #763644 - 20/02/2009 15:59

I was not aware of that fact Nick, thanks for clarifying

--------------------
She (Avro Vulcan XH558) Took To The Sky Like A Lovesick Angel.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
taxor



Reged: 09/07/2004
Posts: 722
Loc: Lancaster, UK
Re: to push or not to push [Re: Benchista]
      #764129 - 21/02/2009 20:22

Quote:

Only thing is that it's not a true 3200 film anyway, and is already being pushed to reach that speed. But there are so many variables at work that it's really hard to predict what might be best.


This is true. Popular wisdom suggests a true(er) speed closer to 1600 asa and a development time for 3200 asa. My own ludicrously unscientific tests seems to bear this out.

--------------------
"I wanna hold your gland". Lemming & McCartney


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
johnnopc
newbie


Reged: 25/08/2008
Posts: 43
Re: to push or not to push [Re: taxor]
      #764716 - 23/02/2009 12:46

thanks,
i think with these cameras (with one aperature and one shutter speed) they live or die on exposure latitude and maybe its simply best not to worry about it too much...
ian


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PeteE
addict


Reged: 23/08/2005
Posts: 440
Loc: BRENTWOOD,Essex
Re: to push or not to push [Re: johnnopc]
      #765350 - 24/02/2009 17:16

If it is at all OLD then it will be even slower than 1600 ASA as fast film ages so quickly,even when stored in a fridge - there are atomic particles bombarding the Earth from space which go through the metal fridge door and just LOVE to find some film emulsion to lodge in, causing a high fog level and loss of speed.

--------------------
Got COMPUTERISED at last and now Digitised but FILM still RULES!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1

Subscribe now »

NIKON D3X VS SONY ALPHA 850
Both of these full-frame cameras from Nikon and Sony have more than 24.5 million pixels, yet the D3X costs around £3,100 more. Richard Sibley takes a look at each to find out what you get for the extra outlay

More




Extra information
0 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, Mat Gallagher, Benchista, Siuya, lisadb, Fen, Damien Demolder, TheFatControlleR, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R, Mike Lowe, OneTen, Hotblack, hhmr 


Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 2075

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.066 seconds in which 0.005 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression disabled.