Amateur Photographer Magazine

Skip to Content

The world's number one weekly photography magazine

Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource

Technical Discussions: Film >> Traditional Darkroom
 |  Print Topic
Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Bone_Idle
Mr Maybe


Reged: 28/07/2006
Posts: 1836
Loc: Bradford
How good is universal Print and film Developer?
      #726939 - 05/11/2008 13:40

A quick question. How good is universal Print and film Developer?

I'm wanting to try home processing and printing and have managed to cobble together a few items from eBay and freeCycle, and not I think I just need to get some chemicals.

I like the idea of a universal developer as it cuts down on expenditure whilst I experiment.

The Developer in question is Champion Suprol Universal Film & Print Developer, and I'll also get the Champion fixer.

--------------------
Thanks

Nick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RichardSibley
AP Technical Writer


Reged: 03/08/2007
Posts: 96
Re: How good is universal Print and film Developer? [Re: Bone_Idle]
      #726982 - 05/11/2008 14:21

For experimenting universal developer should be fine. As you progress you may want to read up on a few different developers for films/paper that produce slightly different results.

From experience I've found that universal developer tends to produce better results for paper than it does for film.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
beejaybee
Marvin


Reged: 18/07/2007
Posts: 6274
Loc: Really Here In Name Only
Re: How good is universal Print and film Developer? [Re: Bone_Idle]
      #726991 - 05/11/2008 14:25

Quote:

How good is universal Print and film Developer?



Which one?

I used to use ID-11 for both film & paper. Worked very well for both, but that was before multigrade.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bone_Idle
Mr Maybe


Reged: 28/07/2006
Posts: 1836
Loc: Bradford
Re: How good is universal Print and film Developer? [Re: beejaybee]
      #727015 - 05/11/2008 15:59

It's Champion Suprol Universal Film & Print Developer - saw it at First call photography.

--------------------
Thanks

Nick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bone_Idle
Mr Maybe


Reged: 28/07/2006
Posts: 1836
Loc: Bradford
Re: How good is universal Print and film Developer? [Re: RichardSibley]
      #727016 - 05/11/2008 16:00

Quote:

For experimenting universal developer should be fine. As you progress you may want to read up on a few different developers for films/paper that produce slightly different results.

From experience I've found that universal developer tends to produce better results for paper than it does for film.




Thanks

--------------------
Thanks

Nick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
taxor



Reged: 09/07/2004
Posts: 721
Loc: Lancaster, UK
Re: How good is universal Print and film Developer? [Re: Bone_Idle]
      #727044 - 05/11/2008 17:42

As per the other replies. For experimentation, no probs. For anything approaching a fine print, use a dedicated film dev.

--------------------
"I wanna hold your gland". Lemming & McCartney


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bone_Idle
Mr Maybe


Reged: 28/07/2006
Posts: 1836
Loc: Bradford
Re: How good is universal Print and film Developer? [Re: taxor]
      #727269 - 06/11/2008 06:53

I suppose the next question is, what is a recomended film developer?

Bear in mind I have not developed a film before, so I don't want anything that needs 100% precision regarding temperature and mix etc.

--------------------
Thanks

Nick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Terrywoodenpic
A whiff of silicon...


Reged: 21/01/2006
Posts: 909
Loc: Saddleworth UK
Re: How good is universal Print and film Developer? [Re: Bone_Idle]
      #727572 - 06/11/2008 20:12

Most universal developer work well for prints but less well for film.

If they give a range of dilutions and development times, use the greatest dilution they state. it will give the best shadow detail and least grain.
Don't add any time or temperature for "luck" you will just increase contrast and grain.

--------------------
65 happy photo years from amateur to professional and back. Caught the bug Young.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1

Subscribe now »

NIKON D3X VS SONY ALPHA 850
Both of these full-frame cameras from Nikon and Sony have more than 24.5 million pixels, yet the D3X costs around £3,100 more. Richard Sibley takes a look at each to find out what you get for the extra outlay

More




Extra information
0 registered and 1 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, Mat Gallagher, Benchista, Siuya, lisadb, Fen, Damien Demolder, TheFatControlleR, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R, Mike Lowe, OneTen, Hotblack, hhmr 


Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 1688

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.06 seconds in which 0.006 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression disabled.