OneTen
'Two Breakfasts'
Reged: 23/06/2003
Posts: 2538
Loc: Devon
|
|
Has this one slipped under the radar?
Clicky
--------------------
Richard .......... My Website - My Blog - My Flickr
|
Benchista
Wich Tyler
Reged: 11/08/2000
Posts: 37849
Loc: Everywhere and nowhere, baby
|
|
Yippee! A wideangle at last!
Boo! Too many pixels.
--------------------
Nick
www.nbrphoto.com
Light and Shade II - the new blog
|
beejaybee
Marvin
Reged: 18/07/2007
Posts: 4967
Loc: Really Here In Name Only
|
|
Quote:
Yippee! A wideangle at last!
Boo! Too many pixels.
And still too thick to fit in a pocket - unless steamrollered.
|
Damien Demolder
Tharg the Mighty
Reged: 22/08/2001
Posts: 1021
Loc: Essex born and badly-bred
|
|
Quote:
And still too thick to fit in a pocket - unless steamrollered.
The camera or the pocket?
Raw files work in DPP too, and nice new dials on top. Just been to see it - v excited. Just hope it's not too noisey.
--------------------
.
See my photographs at www.wordsonpictures.com
.
|
daft_biker
Action Man!
Reged: 11/10/2006
Posts: 7668
Loc: Doon the glen
|
|
Quote:
Yippee! A wideangle at last!
Boo! Too many pixels.
Boo! Fast at the wide end will no doubt mean slower at standard focal lengths I use for bike pics.
Agree with the too many pixels for "creative cropping"...cropping means the shot was a failure IMO. Just give it enough pixels for an uncropped images and force people to take better pictures in the first place 
--------------------
Andrew (BSRIPN) ... Pics.
|
Damien Demolder
Tharg the Mighty
Reged: 22/08/2001
Posts: 1021
Loc: Essex born and badly-bred
|
|
Quote:
and force people to take better pictures in the first place
--------------------
.
See my photographs at www.wordsonpictures.com
.
|
daft_biker
Action Man!
Reged: 11/10/2006
Posts: 7668
Loc: Doon the glen
|
|
I know, it'll never catch on 
--------------------
Andrew (BSRIPN) ... Pics.
|
Paul_R
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 16/06/2006
Posts: 1968
Loc: Middlesbrough, England.
|
|
Quote:
Has this one slipped under the radar?
Clicky
I have been holding off buying the G9 because I wanted something a little wider than 35mm and less noisy above ISO400. Not sure about the latter but I'll have a read through the reviews before finally parting with my hard earned 
--------------------
Regards, Paul CRIPN
http://www.pbase.com/exposethelight
|
Siuya
Cool Hand Chris
Reged: 21/07/2001
Posts: 9767
Loc: Knackers yard!
|
|
Boo from me too! 
1. Too many pixels.
2. No increase in sensor size (like Panny LX3)
3. No variangle screen (don't need 3" flat)
4. 28mm with soft corners (I'd accept it if it was 24mm). I don't get soft corners on my Ricoh 28mm R6.
5. No HD video format or H264 compression for small files.
Missed oppotunity for Canon - roll on G11
--------------------
Chris
The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it (AA)
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
