colin343
enthusiast
Reged: 17/05/2006
Posts: 266
Loc: glasgow
|
|
im hoping to buy a 35mm lens for my bessa r2m, i read on a forum that single coated lens are better than muti coated for black and white pics, is this the case?..and if so why?
thanks in advance guys colin
|
beejaybee
Marvin
Reged: 18/07/2007
Posts: 4967
Loc: Really Here In Name Only
|
|
Quote:
i read on a forum that single coated lens are better than muti coated for black and white pics, is this the case?
Tosh.
|
Benchista
Wich Tyler
Reged: 11/08/2000
Posts: 37849
Loc: Everywhere and nowhere, baby
|
|
Indeed; however, there are some single-coated (Leica, principally) lenses that are particularly highly regarded for B&W because of their particular properties - actually more their technical failings than their good points - they simply produce more interesting images.
-------------------- Nick
www.nbrphoto.com
Light and Shade II - the new blog
|
beejaybee
Marvin
Reged: 18/07/2007
Posts: 4967
Loc: Really Here In Name Only
|
|
Quote:
there are some single-coated (Leica, principally) lenses that are particularly highly regarded for B&W because of their particular properties
But being single coated is not significant. Those lenses would have the same properties if they were uncoated, or multicoated. If you take an uncoated lens and apply a single coating you will just get less flare shooting into the light, and marginally more contrast. Multicoating reduces flare and increases contrast a bit more.
There are some single-coated lenses that are, and always will be, better than some multicoated lenses. But not especially for monochrome, and not because of the coating.
|
Benchista
Wich Tyler
Reged: 11/08/2000
Posts: 37849
Loc: Everywhere and nowhere, baby
|
|
Absolutely. It's not cause and effect.
-------------------- Nick
www.nbrphoto.com
Light and Shade II - the new blog
|
colin343
enthusiast
Reged: 17/05/2006
Posts: 266
Loc: glasgow
|
|
thanks for the quick response guys, you have been very helpful....and i ilke the word "tosh"..i may use that
|