Amateur Photographer Magazine

Skip to Content
Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource

Equipment >> Sony Chat
 |  Print Topic
Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
GrahamR
journeyman


Reged: 13/11/2006
Posts: 78
Sony 16-80 CZ over 17-35 & 28-75 KM ?
      #685158 - 31/07/2008 11:47

Hi all,

I have currently got the Konica Minolta 17-35 f2.8-4 and the Konica Minolta 28-75mm f2.8 as my wide to standard zoom length range.

I don't use the 17-35 very often, as I find the zoom length rather limited and always changing lenses, but I do think the 28-75 f2.8 is an excellent fast zoom lens. Probably my must used lens on the A700, and even the Dynax 7.


Have any of you purchased the CZ 16-80 lens and been throughly happy with it.
Would you recommend it for my A700, and would the results be extra special.

I would really like to go for the lens, but its very expensive.


Many thanks
Graham


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Roger_Provins
Made-it Man


Reged: 22/10/2005
Posts: 3059
Loc: Gloucester, UK
Re: Sony 16-80 CZ over 17-35 & 28-75 KM ? [Re: GrahamR]
      #685192 - 31/07/2008 12:19

Quote:

Have any of you purchased the CZ 16-80 lens and been throughly happy with it.
Would you recommend it for my A700, and would the results be extra special.




I found the 28-70mm too restrictive on APC, it's probably just right on a FF. I now have the 16-80mm Zeiss and I'm very happy with it. Build is a bit plastic but less so than the 28-70mm - anyway seems plenty strong enough. It's certainly very sharp with descent colours and is also very fast to focus on my a700 and would recommend it.

--------------------
Rog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Dorset_Mike
Gadget Man


Reged: 11/05/2006
Posts: 1839
Loc: Poole, Dorset.
Re: Sony 16-80 CZ over 17-35 & 28-75 KM ? [Re: Roger_Provins]
      #685870 - 02/08/2008 10:22

Are you looking for a one lens solution, or would you be happy with two lenses? The Tamron 17-50/2.8 gives a bit more length than your 17-35 plus is constant f2.8;

For an alternative one lens solution with a more attractive price then the Sigma 17-70/2.8-4.5 may be worth considering.

There is also a Sony 16-105, a bit cheaper than the Zeiss but a bit slower, but I don't see it listed by any UK dealers as yet.

--------------------
Cheers, MIKE



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dennis72
newbie


Reged: 14/04/2007
Posts: 2
Loc: Worcestershire
Re: Sony 16-80 CZ over 17-35 & 28-75 KM ? [Re: GrahamR]
      #688754 - 09/08/2008 00:42

I invested in the CZ 16-80 and I am totally satisfied with it.It is expensive but the results from it in my opinion are unequalled.
Regards - Denis


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TallPaul
journeyman


Reged: 28/03/2008
Posts: 63
Loc: Berkshire
Re: Sony 16-80 CZ over 17-35 & 28-75 KM ? [Re: GrahamR]
      #696890 - 27/08/2008 09:09

For what its worth, I find my Sigma 10-20 to be the perfect match for the 28-75 - although I know what you mean about the 28 not being wide enough, and always changing lenses.

I find the 28-75 to be perfect focal length on my film Dynax 7 though.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1

Subscribe now »

AFRICAN ODYSSEY
For his latest book, wildlife photographer Steve Bloom focuses not just on the animals, but also on the people of the African continent. Bob Aylott finds out how he brought his subjects so vividly to life

More




Extra information
0 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Fen, Siuya, GCW, Benchista, huwevans, TheFatControlleR, Damien Demolder, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R 


Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 1711

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.053 seconds in which 0.008 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression disabled.