Amateur Photographer Magazine

Skip to Content
Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource

Technical Discussions: Film >> Traditional Darkroom
 |  Print Topic
Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
londondailyphoto
newbie


Reged: 15/12/2006
Posts: 25
What's gone wrong? (Processing T-Max)
      #669419 - 21/06/2008 13:39

I don't know why this went wrong, any thoughts appreciated.
Here's a pic of both sides the negs: http://www.londondailyphoto.com/images/IMG_2349.JPG

I normally process TMax (Tmax400 in this case) in T-Max Dev but as I had some D-76 left at the end of it's life, I used that. To be exact, I had about 800ml of D76 mixed 6 weeks ago, used once 5 minutes before to process a roll of Fuji Acros (perfect) I poured the 500ml from the Acros dev back into the container and used 500ml of that in the tank. 20.5oC, 7 min 10 s, Ilford rapid fixer - (end of use, too, but I didn't think it was exhausted).

Unfortunately, I always take care with times and chemicals so I've had no experience of failure, and I don't know what's happened. Any ideas?

--------------------
Ham
===


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
zx9
old hand


Reged: 22/06/2007
Posts: 806
Loc: London
Re: What's gone wrong? (Processing T-Max) [Re: londondailyphoto]
      #669424 - 21/06/2008 14:02

Difficult to say from the picture in your kitchen sink! The one on the left looks un fixed, not even started to clear. The one on the right looks about right on the developer but still not completely fixed, if this is the Fuji I would say the fix is exhausted. Have you tried to refix both films with fresh solution, wont do any harm and you might still get some useable negs.

--------------------
Regards
ZX9 (Keith)

My Flickr Pictures


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
londondailyphoto
newbie


Reged: 15/12/2006
Posts: 25
Re: What's gone wrong? (Processing T-Max) [Re: zx9]
      #669428 - 21/06/2008 14:17

Thanks for the thoughts, the left and right are the same film (and it's T-Max 400 - all that about the Fuji Acros was the previous roll I had just done), just on both sides. And it was sitting in fix as I was typing but you are right - I've now gone for fresh stuff.

--------------------
Ham
===


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
zx9
old hand


Reged: 22/06/2007
Posts: 806
Loc: London
Re: What's gone wrong? (Processing T-Max) [Re: londondailyphoto]
      #669438 - 21/06/2008 14:56

If it was all the same film then some of it must have been on the spiral incorrectly such that two layers of film were in intimate contact. This would stop solution getting to the emulsion and cause some of it to be un-developed and un-fixed. This would be confirmed when you refix, if that area becomes entirely clear.

--------------------
Regards
ZX9 (Keith)

My Flickr Pictures


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
londondailyphoto
newbie


Reged: 15/12/2006
Posts: 25
Re: What's gone wrong? (Processing T-Max) [Re: zx9]
      #669443 - 21/06/2008 15:19

No, you misunderstood what I meant about the pic. That's what the same film looked like from either side. Fixing again has cleared it slightly but it is still a pile of poo.

There is a note on the TMax datasheet "this will exhaust fixer more quickly than any other film" but, as I said, the Acros cleared perfectly. urgh.

--------------------
Ham
===


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1

Subscribe now »

GETTING THE MOST OUT OF YOUR OLYMPUS E-3
Angel Nicholson turns her attention towards the Olympus E-3, the company's flagship Four Thirds camera, and looks at how to maximise its photographic potential

More




Extra information
0 registered and 5 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, GCW, Benchista, Siuya, huwevans, Fen, Damien Demolder, TheFatControlleR, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R 


Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 533

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.09 seconds in which 0.011 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression disabled.