PaulatUKcamera
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 24/05/2005
Posts: 1919
Loc: West Wales
|
|
Tried to find the Chinese original, but its gone!(Must be true then, if it's been pulled?)
Instruction book sighted
If anybody wants to dump your D300 cheaply so as to be ready to join the reserve list, I'm your man!
Paul
--------------------
Paul Winter (CRIPN)
Web Site: UKCamera.com
|
Garfield
Fanboy
Reged: 19/12/2007
Posts: 116
Loc: London
|
|
Quote:
Tried to find the Chinese original, but its gone!(Must be true then, if it's been pulled?)
Instruction book sighted
If anybody wants to dump your D300 cheaply so as to be ready to join the reserve list, I'm your man!
Paul
I sincerley hope it's not true on the basis that I have a D300 and won't be able to afford a new camera for some years to come! (I wanted a D3 but couldn't stretch that far)
--------------------
Please read the rules on Signatures
|
IvorETower
Little Buttercup
Reged: 15/11/2006
Posts: 1759
Loc: Camberley, Surrey
|
|
It looks suspiciously like a D300 but with a different name; maybe 300 is unlucky in China, but 700 is lucky (for some) ?
--------------------
Too many cameras, too many lenses.......
|
weasley
addict
Reged: 11/01/2006
Posts: 502
|
|
I'd tend to agree. It's almost unthinkable that Nikon could get a new model to final spec and prepare marketing material for it without it getting out via more plausible routes. I'm not clued up on the D300 specs but a brief scan of that brochure doesn't seem to show anything new. Besides, it doesn't fit with Nikon's recent incremental naming protocols - I would expect a D300s/x or D400 to follow the D300.
|
Sid
newbie
Reged: 20/08/2007
Posts: 11
|
|
Quote:
I'd tend to agree. It's almost unthinkable that Nikon could get a new model to final spec and prepare marketing material for it without it getting out via more plausible routes. I'm not clued up on the D300 specs but a brief scan of that brochure doesn't seem to show anything new. Besides, it doesn't fit with Nikon's recent incremental naming protocols - I would expect a D300s/x or D400 to follow the D300.
Says it's FX format though - 5Ds competitor at RRP around £2k perhaps?
|
alanS
Dr Dust
Reged: 30/09/2005
Posts: 3653
Loc: Up North, England.
|
|
Something about it here -
web page
--------------------
Alan's defence lawyer claimed that "Booze played no part in his typo's."
|
Seven..
...or maybe Eight
Reged: 03/02/2003
Posts: 5102
Loc: Havant, UK
|
|
Crikey I'm gobsmacked at the panic!!! So you buy a D300 a new model comes out and all of a sudden you need to get the new one????
If you were happy enough to spend a K on a camera surely it's going to last a few years at least???
OR more money than sense?
Sorry if this sounds insulting but I can't get my head around the panic that Nikon may dare do such a thing, it will happen in under a years time so what the hell.
Can't understand why it's not the D400? So to my mind it wouldn't be a progression from the D300 but a new target audience!
lol Paul if it's cheap enough I you woMAN too 
--------------------
Tanya(BSRIPN)
CastVision
|
spangler
enthusiast
Reged: 04/04/2008
Posts: 393
Loc: Aylesbury
|
|
A link on the Nikonians website suggests that the alleged D700 is scheduled for release in time for the Olympics. There is also talk of a D3X with a 24MP sensor! Someone made the comment that if the D700 was a full frame camera it should have a larger pentaprism housing than the illustrations suggest.
Regards, Andrew
--------------------
Inspire Digital Solutions - why is this forum so slow and why don't you answer your correspondence?
|
jimbo1964
journeyman
Reged: 25/07/2006
Posts: 80
|
|
This is a spoof I think. The camera has the old d200 style socket covers.
|
surf_digby
journeyman
Reged: 04/04/2008
Posts: 59
|
|
Quote:
Can't understand why it's not the D400? So to my mind it wouldn't be a progression from the D300 but a new target audience!
I'm guessing it's because it's an FX rather than a DX. This way the D300 will eventually be surpassed by the D400, and the D700 will be surpassed by the D800.
I'm more curious about what will replace the D60, seeing as there's already been a D70.
|
PaulatUKcamera
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 24/05/2005
Posts: 1919
Loc: West Wales
|
|
Actually having started this thread thinking "another miracle of Photoshop" I have come to the conclusion it is probably true.
The more you look at the so-called "deadly" rivalry between Nikon and Canon, you must observe they never clash at the same price point. Wouldn't in the least surprise me if there was a "Gentleman's Agreement" to that end!
So bearing in mind the past, it makes sense to have a line up on the lines of: D40 1000D D60 450D D90 50D D300 5Dmk11 D700 (Trying to read the runes of what both makes might do this year)
Pointless speculation for me - bought a D300 and that is definitely that!
Paul
--------------------
Paul Winter (CRIPN)
Web Site: UKCamera.com
|
Towershot
old hand
Reged: 19/03/2007
Posts: 766
Loc: Lancashire, U,K.
|
|
Quite agree with Seven, very happy with the D300,and will only change in the next few years if they bring out a medium format the same size and price as the D300................................................................................ And even then it would have to make me a cup of tea after each session. 
--------------------
Got a good camera, now to get a good photographer.:~<
Rick
My Flickr
|
Seven..
...or maybe Eight
Reged: 03/02/2003
Posts: 5102
Loc: Havant, UK
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Can't understand why it's not the D400? So to my mind it wouldn't be a progression from the D300 but a new target audience!
I'm guessing it's because it's an FX rather than a DX. This way the D300 will eventually be surpassed by the D400, and the D700 will be surpassed by the D800.
I'm more curious about what will replace the D60, seeing as there's already been a D70.
D60 B 
There's a good point
lol Rick yeah think I would certainly want it jumping through hoops
I'm not sure I buy into this full frame thing, I mean can you tell any difference with an A3 print?
I'm totally untechnical and wonder just what advantages a full frame has?
--------------------
Tanya(BSRIPN)
CastVision
|
Malcolm_Stewart
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/07/2005
Posts: 2583
Loc: Milton Keynes, UK
|
|
Quote:
...
I'm totally untechnical and wonder just what advantages a full frame has?
Two aspects
1 If you have a background in film SLRs, full frame gives you the same angle of view, Depth of Field as you used to get on film. Some people find this very important.
2 If your sensor has the same number of pixels but spread across a full frame sensor (as opposed to a smaller APS sized sensor), the pixel density is lower, and this means that your lens' performance will be better. (The higher resolution and lower contrast aspects of your lens simply won't be recorded.) However, towards the edges of the full frame sensor, the light rays will be more oblique and shading may (will) occur at larger apertures.
I have an EOS 5D and compared to my cropped DSLRs (including a 1D MkIII), it delivers good/excellent results with less effort. Visible on A4 prints, and easily visible on A3+ - but it does depend on my using prime lenses rather than zooms, even those which get good reviews.
--------------------
Malcolm Stewart
|
Fen
BAD WOLF
Reged: 12/03/2002
Posts: 20929
Loc: Currently Unknown!
|
|
Quote:
2 If your sensor has the same number of pixels but spread across a full frame sensor (as opposed to a smaller APS sized sensor), the pixel density is lower, and this means that your lens' performance will be better.
Also, it's been proven to lower the amount of digital noise.
--------------------
Fen .......... My Galleries - My Blog - My Flickr
|
parisian
Over the hill and far away...
Reged: 10/02/2002
Posts: 7722
Loc: Môn mam cymru
|
|
The advantage of 'C' sensors on the other hand is of course that with full frame lenses (not DX) then you get to use just the 'sweet spot' on the central lens area. Sharper and aberration free (usually).
--------------------
Hells pensioner - born to be mild
|
b1untfrc3trauma
newbie
Reged: 20/06/2008
Posts: 2
|
|
Here is the link to the photos of the supposed D700.
http://gizmodo.com/5017658/nikon-d700-mi...r-and-autofocus
Tommy
|
Seven..
...or maybe Eight
Reged: 03/02/2003
Posts: 5102
Loc: Havant, UK
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
...
I'm totally untechnical and wonder just what advantages a full frame has?
Two aspects
1 If you have a background in film SLRs, full frame gives you the same angle of view, Depth of Field as you used to get on film. Some people find this very important.
2 If your sensor has the same number of pixels but spread across a full frame sensor (as opposed to a smaller APS sized sensor), the pixel density is lower, and this means that your lens' performance will be better. (The higher resolution and lower contrast aspects of your lens simply won't be recorded.) However, towards the edges of the full frame sensor, the light rays will be more oblique and shading may (will) occur at larger apertures.
I have an EOS 5D and compared to my cropped DSLRs (including a 1D MkIII), it delivers good/excellent results with less effort. Visible on A4 prints, and easily visible on A3+ - but it does depend on my using prime lenses rather than zooms, even those which get good reviews.
Thanks Malcolm that makes thing a lot clearer to my mind.
So it really would be a good idea to buy lenses that will work with a full framed sensor for the eventuality of most DSLR's becoming full frame?
--------------------
Tanya(BSRIPN)
CastVision
|
Seven..
...or maybe Eight
Reged: 03/02/2003
Posts: 5102
Loc: Havant, UK
|
|
Quote:
Here is the link to the photos of the supposed D700.
http://gizmodo.com/5017658/nikon-d700-mi...r-and-autofocus
Tommy
whether this is correct or not we would all be a bit naive if we didn't think Nikon would be working on something new already!
Someone should tell that person it's not 'realer' but 'more real'
--------------------
Tanya(BSRIPN)
CastVision
|
Malcolm_Stewart
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/07/2005
Posts: 2583
Loc: Milton Keynes, UK
|
|
Quote:
...
So it really would be a good idea to buy lenses that will work with a full framed sensor for the eventuality of most DSLR's becoming full frame?
Hmmm.
I think I ought to leave that to better qualified Nikon owners to answer. (A short time ago I was seriously considering buying a D300 plus some long lenses for birding. That is, until I did a trawl around Nikon's lens catalogue (and s/h offers) and decided that it would be cheaper for me to get a 1D MkIII and continue to use my Canon lenses.)
--------------------
Malcolm Stewart
|
Done&rundleCams
Senior Member
Reged: 20/12/2001
Posts: 16752
Loc: Vancouver, BC
|
|
Quote:
If anybody wants to dump your D300 cheaply so as to be ready to join the reserve list, I'm your man!
Paul
.... because it takes the same accessories
Quote:
Power(电源) :
• Lithium-Ion EN-EL3e (7.4 V, 1500 mAh)
• Included battery charger MH-18a
• Optional AC adapter EH-5a
• Optional MB-D10 battery pack / vertical grip
Vertical grip(外接手柄) :
• Optional MB-D10 battery pack / vertical grip
• One Rechargeable Li-ion Battery EN-EL4a, EN-EL4 or EN-EL3e or eight R6/AA-size alkaline (LR6), Ni-MH (HR6), lithium (FR6) batteries, or nickel-manganese ZR6 batteries
Hi ya Paul,
Jack
--------------------
Life is a Photo-op
MY BLOG: www.nakedmanonawire.blogspot.com
|
Adesw
The phantom flasher
Reged: 07/02/2008
Posts: 715
|
|
Im sorry guys, but Im sure its a fake
Any similarities?
I also seem no logic in going back to the old style of covers, as people have made it clear that the D300/3 stlye ones work much better!
Edited by Adesw (26/06/2008 21:43)
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
