|
|
|||||||
Quote: Certainly, but I'm not sure you could get anything that would compare with the sort of image quality this one is likely* to deliver. Most vintage roll-film folders suffered from poor film flatness problems, and had at best only single coated Tessar-type lenses (uncoated, prior to about the mid-1940s) - respectable enough at 'standard' focal length, but unlikely to match what we can almost certainly expect from a modern multicoated six-element Fujinon. The only 'vintage' camera that I can immediately think of that would probably be genuinely comparable would be the Plaubel Makina 67, which I think generally goes for a lot more than £650. * - I'm speculating, obviously, but this type of camera is not new in the modern photographic era (cf. the Plaubel Makina I mentioned, or Fuji's own past record in both rigid and folding medium format rangefinders), and Fuji's abilities in the optical department are also a known quantity. there seems no reason not to expect excellent image quality, almost certainly surpassing what is typically achieved by vintage folders. |