|
|
|||||||
Quote: When you present them as fact, yes. Be as over-enthusiastic as you like when you make clear it's opinion. Quote: I have no idea what your standards are, nor those of the OP - and that's the point - you have no idea of the OP's standards, either. All we know is that a compact doesn't meet his requirements in this area. Quote: Indeed so. Quote: The results from it that I've seen are perfectly respectable, and IMVHO it should be on the OP's shortlist unless he is particularly demanding about high ISO performance. The E-520 appears to be a decent and sound camera that represnts good value in the two-lens kit. It's got a lot going for it. I'm absolutely not telling the OP not to buy it - it may be the camera that suits him best, and if it is, great. If he decides that nothing less than a Nikon D3 will suit him, that's great too - as long as he makes the decision that's right for him, it could be a film disposable for all I care. I find it utterly incomprehensible that anyone might take a different view to that, TBH - why should it matter to anyone else what brand somebody chooses?
|