ZenitE
(newbie)
24/06/2008 22:20
Sigma 18-50 2.8EX DC Macro -v- Zuiko 14-54 2.8-3.5 and beyond

At present I am using a 14-45 kit on a E-500, but the time has come to upgrade. Has anyone had the chance to compare the above 2 lenses? Obviously the Sigma is £100 cheaper but with 2.8 throughout and Macro is it it a better lens?. The 14-54 Zuiko has always been seen as the obvious upgrade, and being a Oly, has higher connotations of Quality. As an aside I've just bought a 70-300 Zuiko and it is a cracker, the purpose of this question is to try and get the highest quality of lenses (on a budget) through the new 9-18 Zuiko, standard quality zoom and my 70-300, so as to have a 3 lens total coverage.


Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.003 seconds in which 0 seconds were spent on a total of 4 queries. Zlib compression disabled.