Amateur Photographer Magazine

Skip to Content
Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource

Equipment >> Leica Camera Chat
 |  Print Topic
Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
jt79
newbie


Reged: 03/10/2007
Posts: 3
M3 Leica
      #549444 - 03/10/2007 19:06

Been offered an M3 for £600 is this worth it?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Zou
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 05/02/2007
Posts: 2105
Loc: Edinburgh
Re: M3 Leica [Re: jt79]
      #549447 - 03/10/2007 19:13

Does it work?
Is it cosmetically in good condition?
Do you want it to resell or to use?
Do you get on with rangefinders?

Your answers would effect whether it waas worth it or not.

--------------------
Zou's Flickr Page


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jt79
newbie


Reged: 03/10/2007
Posts: 3
Re: M3 Leica [Re: Zou]
      #549461 - 03/10/2007 19:49

yes 2 the questions.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mike_j
nobbut a beginner


Reged: 23/08/2005
Posts: 1333
Re: M3 Leica [Re: jt79]
      #549481 - 03/10/2007 20:34

Without being dogmatic I would say that is highly priced. You can get a first class M6 for that sort of price which offers built in metering and many less years' wear.

Of course, if the M3 is in some way special, or includes a lens or three that alters the picture.

Purely as an example have a look at Rangefinder forum classifieds

M3 ad

M6 ad

Edited by mike_j (03/10/2007 21:08)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Woolliscroft
veteran


Reged: 23/08/2005
Posts: 1253
Re: M3 Leica [Re: mike_j]
      #549693 - 04/10/2007 11:15

Ffords currently have six M3s, the most expensive of which is 150 quid cheaper than this. This is body only, though, so as Mike says, any lenses with the camera you have been offered would change the picture.

--------------------
David.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jt79
newbie


Reged: 03/10/2007
Posts: 3
Re: M3 Leica [Re: mike_j]
      #550040 - 04/10/2007 22:09

yeah it comes with 1 lense,leica meter mc and original carry case!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Woolliscroft
veteran


Reged: 23/08/2005
Posts: 1253
Re: M3 Leica [Re: jt79]
      #550222 - 05/10/2007 10:18

Quote:

yeah it comes with 1 lense,leica meter mc and original carry case!




What's a lense?

--------------------
David.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TimF
Senior Member


Reged: 30/07/2001
Posts: 16342
Loc: Herts/Beds border
Re: M3 Leica [Re: Woolliscroft]
      #550716 - 06/10/2007 09:04

Does the meter work accurately? Most of that age will have bitten the dust so to speak. Even if it does, you might prefer to use a hand-held (I certainly did - those kind of clip on meters are a PITA IMVHO) or even just guess.

--------------------
Tim BSRIPN


You see something happening and you bang away at it. Either you get what you saw or you get something else--and whichever is better you print. - Garry Winogrand


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark_Norton



Reged: 29/06/2002
Posts: 1152
Loc: London, UK
Re: M3 Leica [Re: TimF]
      #550761 - 06/10/2007 10:30

If you want to get in to film Leica M, a classic M6 is the sensible starting point. Older cameras are for the peverse luddites and as Tim says, the selenium cells of older Leica meters have mostly gone west.

I would quite like an M5 though because it dared to be different, but no point really as I haven't used a roll of film in goodness knows how long.

--------------------
Mark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Malcolm_Stewart
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 11/07/2005
Posts: 2541
Loc: Milton Keynes, UK
Re: M3 Leica [Re: Woolliscroft]
      #550820 - 06/10/2007 12:23

Quote:

Quote:

yeah it comes with 1 lense, leica meter mc and original carry case!




What's a lense?




Glad to see that I'm not the only one for whom this "spelling" really grates! Is it generated by some non-UK spell checker, I wonder? Or does it derive from people trying to make a singular out of the plural, "lenses"?

And then there's the abomination "aperature" - I kid you not!

--------------------
Malcolm Stewart


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark_Norton



Reged: 29/06/2002
Posts: 1152
Loc: London, UK
Re: M3 Leica [Re: Malcolm_Stewart]
      #550823 - 06/10/2007 12:26

Don't get me started on "their", "there" and "they're".

--------------------
Mark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TimF
Senior Member


Reged: 30/07/2001
Posts: 16342
Loc: Herts/Beds border
Re: M3 Leica [Re: Mark_Norton]
      #550863 - 06/10/2007 15:19

Quote:

If you want to get in to film Leica M, a classic M6 is the sensible starting point. Older cameras are for the peverse luddites



Now there I must take exception. The M3 is built to a higher standard than any other Leica until the MP came out, and even that must take second place IMHO. The lack of an internal meter is really not important is it unless one is totally wedded to 'convenience'. Just think of all those truly great photographs captured by photographers working with only a hand-held at best (or even no meter whatsoever), regardless of what camera they were using.

There are times when an internal meter can be a confounded nuisance in fact, when the inexperienced in particular might find themselves "chasing the meter" (to quote one of the Leica Forum stalwarts). It takes a bit of knowledge to know to ignore the wretched thing flashing away at you under certain more tricky conditions.

Unfortunately we seem to be wedded now to clever-dickish aids in every field.

--------------------
Tim BSRIPN


You see something happening and you bang away at it. Either you get what you saw or you get something else--and whichever is better you print. - Garry Winogrand


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mike_j
nobbut a beginner


Reged: 23/08/2005
Posts: 1333
Re: M3 Leica [Re: TimF]
      #550875 - 06/10/2007 16:11

Quote:

The lack of an internal meter is really not important is it unless one is totally wedded to 'convenience'.




My M6 lightmeter packed up when we were on holiday recently due to flat batteries and I didn't think my German was up to buying replacements. Not a great problem, a mixture of 'Sunny 16' rule and occasional use of wife's Coolpix' as a lightmeter coped quite well but I'm glad to have a working meter again.

Separate light meters mean more gear and slower operation - simplicity and portability are the among the great assets of traditional rangefinder photography.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TimF
Senior Member


Reged: 30/07/2001
Posts: 16342
Loc: Herts/Beds border
Re: M3 Leica [Re: mike_j]
      #550915 - 06/10/2007 18:39

Quote:

Separate light meters mean more gear and slower operation - simplicity and portability are the among the great assets of traditional rangefinder photography.



I used an M3 exclusively when I visited the historic dockyard at Chatham a few years back. Now I'll definitely say that things aren't always the same, but on that occasion the light levels remained pretty constant all the day, so whilst I began by taking a reading , if not for every shot, then certainly whenever I changed the direction I was pointing the camera in, and whenever I moved location, in the end I found it wasn't needed as the readings were always the same regardless. This is the greatest benefit of incident meters IMO, that they are unaffected by any subject brightness. The upshot is that you really only need to take a new reading when the light level changes - even with a contre-jour picture. A reflected light meter will make you think otherwise.

Even today, with all the clever technology inside modern cameras, some of the finest documentary photographers, such as James Nachtwey, still take incident readings and set them manually rather than rely on smart programming.

--------------------
Tim BSRIPN


You see something happening and you bang away at it. Either you get what you saw or you get something else--and whichever is better you print. - Garry Winogrand


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TimF
Senior Member


Reged: 30/07/2001
Posts: 16342
Loc: Herts/Beds border
Re: M3 Leica [Re: TimF]
      #550926 - 06/10/2007 19:18

As an example, this picture was taken against the light using exactly the same readings as were used for this and this, both with the light behind.

--------------------
Tim BSRIPN


You see something happening and you bang away at it. Either you get what you saw or you get something else--and whichever is better you print. - Garry Winogrand


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark_Norton



Reged: 29/06/2002
Posts: 1152
Loc: London, UK
Re: M3 Leica [Re: TimF]
      #551108 - 07/10/2007 14:14

I don't subscribe to all this head-in-the-sand "I don't need a meter" stuff. Might mention that Wey Cameras, who are sadly closing down, have a secondhand M6 for just £495, reduced in their closing-down sale. Stick a 50/2 or 35/2 on the front and you'll be in good shape.

--------------------
Mark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Burgy
Grateful not to have one


Reged: 13/04/2001
Posts: 5199
Loc: This far, from beating 7 shade...
Re: M3 Leica [Re: Mark_Norton]
      #551135 - 07/10/2007 17:05

Quote:

I don't subscribe to all this head-in-the-sand "I don't need a meter" stuff.




Just because you don't doesn't mean that it doesn't have a place. I used to frequently estimate the exposure before the camera was lifted to my eye, depending on the subject matter, set the aperture or shutter speed first then get the other to the right ball park area (I am usually within a stop or so) fine adjustments then made at eye level, if there is time.

--------------------
Cheers


Burgy BSRIPN, BSc, DSO and Bar (now open 24/7).
it's not what you've got, its who you do it to
http://togsblog.wordpress.com
http://www.PressPhotosUK.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Woolliscroft
veteran


Reged: 23/08/2005
Posts: 1253
Re: M3 Leica [Re: Burgy]
      #551278 - 08/10/2007 09:21

What's "head in the sand" about being a good judge of exposure?

--------------------
David.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Burgy
Grateful not to have one


Reged: 13/04/2001
Posts: 5199
Loc: This far, from beating 7 shade...
Re: M3 Leica [Re: Woolliscroft]
      #551522 - 08/10/2007 20:08

I didn't say it, I quoted!

--------------------
Cheers


Burgy BSRIPN, BSc, DSO and Bar (now open 24/7).
it's not what you've got, its who you do it to
http://togsblog.wordpress.com
http://www.PressPhotosUK.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
willicwm
newbie


Reged: 13/09/2007
Posts: 1
Re: M3 Leica [Re: Burgy]
      #551924 - 09/10/2007 17:14

M2,3,4 All excelent M6 POOREST CAMERA Ihave ever had in 56yyears use. Faults exactly the same in Pauul Ross photography on the net , FINGS AINT WOT they used to be. willicwm

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)

Subscribe now »

CANON POWERSHOT G10
If you're looking for a compact camera to complement your DSLR, then Canon's latest model could be just the thing. Richard Sibley finds out whether it makes the grade

More




Extra information
0 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, GCW, Siuya, huwevans, Benchista, Fen, TheFatControlleR, Damien Demolder, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R 


Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 5208

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.072 seconds in which 0.019 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression disabled.